Abstract

To investigate differences between childhood (cPAN)- and adult-onset polyarteritis nodosa (aPAN) patients. cPAN patients' clinical findings at onset and outcomes were compared to those of aPAN patients from the French Vasculitis Study Group registry matched for year of enrollment and initial systemic versus cutaneous disease. Their information on medications, disease activity and damage were collected. Kaplan-Meier relapse-free survival curves and the log-rank test were used to analyze cPAN versus aPAN differences for predefined outcomes. Twenty-one children with systemic and 13 with cutaneous PAN were compared with 84 systemic- and 27 cutaneous-matched aPAN patients. Median follow-up exceeded 5 years for both groups. At study entry, mononeuritis multiplex was less frequent in systemic cPAN than systemic aPAN (P = 0.04), and purpura and myalgias were less frequent in cutaneous cPAN than cutaneous aPAN (P < 0.03). During follow-up, systemic cPAN relapsed more often than matched systemic aPAN (P < 0.0001), while relapse rates were similar for cutaneous disease (P > 0.05). Mostly minor relapses, predominantly involving the skin, occurred in all 4 groups. At last visit, damage accrual was comparable for cPAN and aPAN patients, but fewer systemic cPAN patients were treatment-free (15% versus 42%; P = 0.03). Two (6%) cPAN and 8 (7%) aPAN patients died. Systemic PAN is equally severe in children and adults and carries a higher risk of relapse. The main cutaneous PAN features seem not to be influenced by age at disease onset.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.