Abstract
A primary consideration in longitudinal growth studies is the identification of growth from error components. While previous research has considered matters of measurement accuracy and reproducibility in detail, few reports have investigated the errors of measurement due to aspects of the physiology and cooperation of the child. The present study directly assesses this source of measurement undependability for the first time. Investigation of total measurement error variance in 925 recumbent length replicates taken over stasis intervals in growth identifies that between 60% and 70% of total measurement unreliability is due to a child factor undependability. Individual differences are significant and longitudinal growth analyses should consider two to three times the technical error of measurement statistic as a reasonable estimate of the total unreliability for any single measurement of an infant's recumbent length. These results raise issues regarding analytic methods as applied to serial growth data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
