Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in South Africa—Senior Stakeholder Perceptions of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats in the Western Cape Province

National Health Service Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services are specialist teams that assess and treat children and young people with mental health problems. Overall, 497,502 children were referred to National Health Service Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services between 2020 and 2021, and almost one-quarter of these referrals were not successful. Unsuccessful referrals are often distressing for children and families who are turned away usually after a long waiting period and without necessarily being redirected to alternative services. The process is also costly to services because time is wasted reviewing documents about children who should have been referred for alternative help and may prevent young people who need specialist help receiving it in a timely way. The overarching aim of this study was to understand what the problems are with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services referrals and identify solutions that could improve referral success. A key objective was to talk widely with young people and families, people working in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and mental health professionals so that we could understand fully what the problems were and how we might develop their solutions. We gathered individual pseudonymised patient data from nine Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, and referral data from four National Health Service Trusts to look at what data are available and how complete it is. We report wide variation in the numbers of referrals between and within Trusts and in the proportions not being successful for treatment. Data on factors such as age and gender of children and young people referred into Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and who made the referral are routinely collected, but ethnicity of the children and young people's reason for referral are not as well collected across all Trusts. We also conducted focus groups with over 100 individuals with differing perspectives on the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services referral process (children and young people, parents and carers, key referrers, and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services professionals) and asked about current difficulties within the referral process, as well as potential solutions to these. Problems identified included: confusion about what Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services is for, that is what it does and does not provide; and lack of support provided during the referral process. Possible solutions included: streamlining the referral pathways through digital technologies with accompanying standardisation of referral forms for National Health Service Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services; and early ongoing communication throughout the referral 'journey' for the referrer/family. Should consider the standardisation of and improvement to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services referral process following the recommendations outlined in this project. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT05412368. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05412368. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131379) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 13, No. 21. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Mental Health Care Reforms in Latin America: Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in Mexico

Autistic children and young people are at increased risk of mental health difficulties, but often face barriers when seeking help from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. This study aimed to (1) explore the experiences of parents/carers seeking help from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services for their autistic child’s mental health difficulties, and (2) gain parents’ perceptions of the accessibility of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services for their child. A mixed-methods survey design was used. In total, 300 parents/carers took part from across the United Kingdom. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using qualitative content analysis. Findings demonstrated ongoing struggles that parents/carers faced when seeking help from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Those who were referred reported a lack of reasonable adjustments and offers of ineffective or inappropriate therapies. Ultimately, parents felt their child’s mental health difficulties either did not improve or declined to the point of crisis. However, there was a recognition that some professionals were kind and compassionate. There is a need for a more neuro-inclusive and personalised approach in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Further research, funding and training are urgently needed to ensure support is accessible, timely and effective for autistic young people.Lay abstractAutistic children and young people are more likely to experience mental health difficulties than neurotypical peers, but also face more barriers when seeking help from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Findings highlight the need for a more neuroaffirmative approach from the professionals themselves, in the adjustments offered, and in the therapies provided. Barriers to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services for autistic children and young people include diagnostic overshadowing (i.e. assuming mental health difficulties are part of autism), high thresholds for assessment and a lack of professional knowledge about autism and care pathways. Healthcare policies should ensure that all Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services professionals receive neuroaffirmative training and that resources/funding are provided for appropriate adjustments and early support. There is also a need for further research and funding to develop and evaluate effective neuroaffirmative therapeutic interventions.

Emotional disorders are common in children and young people and can significantly impair their quality of life. Evidence-based treatments require a timely and appropriate diagnosis. The utility of standardised diagnostic assessment tools may aid the detection of emotional disorders, but there is limited evidence of their clinical value. To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a standardised diagnostic assessment for children and young people with emotional difficulties referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. A nested qualitative process evaluation aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to using a standardised diagnostic assessment tool in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. A United Kingdom, multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative process evaluation. Eight National Health Service Trusts providing multidisciplinary specialist Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Children and young people aged 5-17 years with emotional difficulties referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, excluding emergency/urgent referrals that required an expedited assessment. In the qualitative process evaluation, 15 young people aged 16-17 years, 38 parents/carers and 56 healthcare professionals participated in semistructured interviews. Participants were randomly assigned (1 : 1) following referral receipt to intervention (the development and well-being assessment) and usual care, or usual care only. Primary outcome was a clinician-made diagnosis decision about the presence of an emotional disorder within 12 months of randomisation, collected from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services clinical records. Secondary outcomes collected from clinical records included referral acceptance, time to offer and start treatment/interventions and discharge. Data were also self-reported from participants through online questionnaires at baseline, 6 and 12 months post randomisation, and the cost effectiveness of the intervention was investigated. One thousand two hundred and twenty-five (1225) children and young people were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to study groups between 27 August 2019 and 17 October 2021; 615 were assigned to the intervention and 610 were assigned to the control group. Adherence to the intervention (full/partial completion of the development and well-being assessment) was 80% (494/615). At 12 months, 68 (11%) participants in the intervention group received an emotional disorder diagnosis versus 72 (12%) in the control group [adjusted risk ratio 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.28); p = 0.71]. Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services acceptance of the index referral [intervention 277 (45%) vs. control 262 (43%); risk ratio: 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.94 to 1.19)] or any referral by 18 months [intervention 374 (61%) vs. control 352 (58%); risk ratio: 1.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.16)] was similar between groups. There was no evidence of any differences between groups for any other secondary outcomes. The qualitative nested process evaluation identified a number of barriers and facilitators to the use of the development and well-being assessment during the trial, particularly at the assessment and diagnosis stages of the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services pathway. It was not possible to mask participants, clinicians or site researchers collecting source data to treatment allocation. We found no evidence that completion of the development and well-being assessment aided the detection of emotional disorders in this study. Using the development and well-being assessment in this way cannot be recommended for clinical practice. To determine longer-term service use outcomes and to investigate whether receipt of a clinical diagnosis makes a difference to clinical outcomes and care/intervention receipt. This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number 16/96/09.

Children and adolescents under the age of 18 years comprise 34% of the population, and child and adolescent Mental, Neurological and Substance Use (MNS) disorders are common and an important cause of disability and distress. Providers at all levels should be competent to screen for and identify common childhood mental disorders, which usually present with developmental delay, emotional and/or behavioural symptoms and/or learning difficulties. Given the burden of disease, the fact that many mental disorders begin in childhood, and that early intervention is most effective in childhood and adolescence, it is essential that effective promotion, prevention, treatment, care and rehabilitation interventions should be provided for children and adolescents. In this webinar, hosted by the Academy of Science of South Africa, leading experts in child and adolescent mental health presented their priorities for child and adolescent mental health services and research in South Africa.

BackgroundResearch has shown a strong association between suicide and mental disorders, and people in contact with services for mental health and substance use are known to be at high risk of suicide. Still, few studies have previously described suicide among young people in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.AimThe aim of this study is to examine the prevalence of contact and suicide rates by gender and age groups, and to describe patient demographics and service utilization in secondary mental health services.MethodsAll young people in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the year prior to death in the period 2008–2018 were identified by linking the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry and the Norwegian Patient Registry. We estimated the prevalence of contact and suicide rates among those with and without contact, by gender and age groups. Characteristics of treatment contact were compared between boys and girls. Variables with significant differences were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model using gender as an outcome.ResultsMore girls (39.7%) than boys (11.8%) had contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the year prior to death. Among girls, suicide rates per 100,000 patients increased linearly in the age groups 10–13, 14–16, and 17–19 years: 5, 22, and 38 per 100,000 patients, respectively. Among boys, the suicide rate increased sharply from 7 per 100,000 patients in the age group 14–16 years to 40 per 100,000 patients in the 17–19-year-old group. In the age-adjusted multivariate model, boys were 4.07 (1.22–14.44, p = 0.024) times more likely to have terminated contact at the time of death.ConclusionThis study shows gender differences in both suicide rates and service utilization among young people in contact with Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services before suicide, and future studies should focus on identifying the causes of these gender differences in service contact.

Treatment Intensity in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and Health Care Reform in Norway, 1998–2006

Urban Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services weaves together different strands of mental health work undertaken in one inner-city Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service by professionals working in a range of ways. In particular, it provides examples of how an urban CAMH service has been responsive to, and influenced by, local circumstances, resources and knowledge. The book explores the relationship between professionals and the community context, which provides the background to the lives of individual service users and the families they serve, and how this relationship is integral to the development of a responsive service. The chapters cover a range of settings and approaches, addressing the social, cultural, political and community contexts impacting on children, young people and families. In this way Urban Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services explores challenges and issues emerging in a responsive approach to child and family work in all community settings whether they be urban, suburban or rural. Urban Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services is intended for mental health and social care professionals involved in therapeutic, social and pastoral work with children, young people, families and communities. The book will be of interest to policy-makers, mental health and social care professionals, health visitors, general practitioners, nurses and midwives , as well as to trainees in these professions including trainee clinical psychologists, social workers or psychoanalytic and systemic psychotherapists. It will also appeal to those interested in responsive communities and critical approaches to therapeutic interventions in mental health work, psychology, psychotherapy and counselling.

Child mental health services in England: a continuing crisis

Mental health problems in childhood and adolescence pose a major threat to public health. Epidemiological studies in high, middle and low income countries indicate that approximately one in five children and adolescents suffer from a mental disorder. In many instances these persist into adulthood. In South Africa, HIV infection, substance use, and exposure to violence increase vulnerability to mental disorders. Child and adolescent mental health services play a key role in reducing the burden of mental disorders in childhood and later in adulthood. This paper focuses on service needs for children and adolescents in South Africa. It commences with a discussion of the prevalence of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders after which the legal and policy context of child and adolescent psychiatric services is described. A framework for child and adolescent mental health service provision is presented, following which steps for reducing the extent of unmet service need are considered. The paper concludes with a call to scale up child and adolescent mental health services in South Africa, based on the stark realities of unmet need and the constitutional rights of children and adolescents to appropriate mental health care.

While the recommendation issued by the Health Advisory Service in 1995 is for a tiered child and adolescent mental health service, there is little published evidence about the outcomes of such services. Our objective was to evaluate an innovative community-based child and adolescent mental health service in South and East Leeds using before and after measures. The client group of the service was children and families with emotional and behavioural problems and/or parenting difficulties. Standardised assessment of families and young people was followed by brief intervention (solution-focused therapy) to the child and family. Descriptive demographic and referral pathway details were recorded, as were baseline and postintervention Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) scores. South Leeds generated almost four times as many referrals in the 9 months after the Tier 2 Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) was set up. Clinically and statistically significant decreases in symptom scores were found for families completing work with the Tier 2 workers. Families referred on to Tier 3 had complex but not more severe problems. The new service encountered previously unmet need among troubled young people in the community, whilst freeing specialist Tier 3 staff to concentrate on complex, chronic problems.

Mental health problems are one of the most pressing public health concerns of our time. Sweden has seen a sharp increase in mental disorders among children and youth during the last decade. The evidence base for treatment of psychiatric conditions has developed strongly. Clinical practice guidelines aim to compile such evidence and support healthcare professionals in evidence-based clinical decision-making. In Sweden, the national guidelines for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were launched in 2010. The aim of this study was two folded, (i) to explore to what extent these guidelines were known and adhered to by health professionals in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services and (ii) to investigate factors influencing implementation of the guidelines informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A qualitative approach was used, and data were collected through interviews with 18 health professionals in Child Mental Health Services in Sweden and a combination of conventional and directed content analyses was used. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided and structured data collection and analysis. The guidelines were largely unknown by health professionals in Child Mental Health Services in all the clinics investigated. Adherence to guideline recommendations was reported as very low. Barriers to implementation were found in relation to the characteristics of the intervention, outer setting, inner setting and characteristics of the individuals involved. The government initiative to develop and disseminate the guidelines seems to have made very little impact on health professionals' clinical practice. The guidelines were poorly aligned with the health professionals' knowledge and beliefs about effective mental health services for children and youth with depression and anxiety disorders. Suggestions for future efforts to improve the development and implementation of guidelines in Child Mental Health Services settings are given.

Aims/BackgroundNear Me is a tele-psychiatry platform for conducting video consultation appointment in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in NHS Orkney (NHSO). This model of consultation was introduced in NHSO CAMHS during the COVID-19 pandemic. The performance in offering effective clinical intervention in the domains of quality of care will determined through the experiences of both users and providers of care in this respect.To assess the perception and experiences of service users (clinicians, patients and their families) on the use of Near Me in NHS Orkney Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services by applying the domains of quality of care as a measure. To enable all stakeholders (policy planners, users and providers) to identify gaps and barriers in the use of Near Me and to inform change in practice.MethodsA survey was developed using the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire which is a validated tool to generate responses on the key domains of quality of care measures of appropriateness, reliability, access, timeliness, usefulness, effectiveness, interaction, quality, efficiency, safety, satisfaction and possibility of future use for both users and providers of care.The survey was made available on social media platforms including websites and online adverts for clinicians, patients and their families in Orkney to complete for a period for 10 weeks.Results28 responses were received with 14 completed responses (6 staffs & 8 patients and families) and 14 uncompleted responses (4 staffs and 10 patients & families).A mean rank test was applied to appropriately evaluate the responses received.Over 50% of respondents show high level of satisfaction in the use of tele-psychiatry services in all domains of quality of care in Orkney NHS CAMHS.Access, timeliness and safety are highly positively rated by both clinicians and service users.Improvement in network connections, improved coordination and understanding of technology will enhance the service.Better understanding of the handling of technical problems in tele-psychiatry services should be addressedReduction of in-person interactions was identified by some respondents as concern.Conclusion/recommendationTele-psychiatry is highly useful and accepted as revealed by the survey but network connections for the Near me platform needs to be improved. Face to face consultations should not be discounted and should be available where possible for better engagement.As the first survey of the use of tele-psychiatry in NHS Orkney, this study will serve to establish a baseline for future evaluation of tele psychiatry services in NHS Orkney CAMHS.

This study examined the relationship of age and gender with risk of arrest among adolescents and young adults who were intensive adolescent users of public mental health services. Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH) and juvenile and criminal courts. Participants were youths receiving DMH adolescent case management services sometime in 1994-1996 who were born between 1976 and 1979 (781 males and 738 females). They were cross-matched to document arrests between age seven and 25. The study examined age at first arrest, age-specific risk, and the relationship between arrest history and arrest risk by gender and age. Most males (69%) and almost half the females (46%) were arrested by age 25. First arrest was most common before age 18. As in the general population, males' arrest patterns were more concerning than those of females, although patterns were of concern in both groups. Most female arrestees had multiple arrests, many as adults. No gender differences were observed for several factors, including risk of first arrest over age 18. Risk was far greater for those arrested in the previous year than for those never arrested. Findings justify concerns of public mental health systems regarding justice system involvement of adolescent clients. Risk of first arrest was significant from early adolescence through age 24, indicating a need for arrest prevention into young adulthood. The heightened arrest risk at all ages among those who were recently arrested demarcates a population in need of immediate intervention.

Mental health disorders often develop during childhood and adolescence, causing long term and debilitating impacts at individual and societal levels. Local, early, and precise assessment and evidence-based treatment are key to achieve positive mental health outcomes and to avoid long-term care. Technological advancements, such as computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs), can support practitioners in providing evidence-based care. While previous studies have found CDSS implementation helps to improve aspects of medical care, evidence is limited on its use for child and adolescent mental health care. This paper presents challenges and opportunities for adapting CDSS design and implementation to child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS). To highlight the complexity of incorporating CDSSs within local CAMHS, we have structured the paper around four components to consider before designing and implementing the CDSS: supporting collaboration among multiple stakeholders involved in care; optimally using health data; accounting for comorbidities; and addressing the temporality of patient care. The proposed perspective is presented within the context of the child and adolescent mental health services in Norway and an ongoing Norwegian innovative research project, the Individualized Digital DEcision Assist System (IDDEAS), for child and adolescent mental health disorders. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among children and adolescents serves as the case example. The integration of IDDEAS in Norway intends to yield significantly improved outcomes for children and adolescents with enduring mental health disorders, and ultimately serve as an educational opportunity for future international approaches to such CDSS design and implementation.