Abstract

Bioimpedance has been widely studied as alternative to respiratory monitoring methods because of its linear relationship with respiratory volume during normal breathing. However, other body tissues and fluids contribute to the bioimpedance measurement. The objective of this study is to investigate the relevance of chest movement in thoracic bioimpedance contributions to evaluate the applicability of bioimpedance for respiratory monitoring. We measured airflow, bioimpedance at four electrode configurations and thoracic accelerometer data in 10 healthy subjects during inspiratory loading. This protocol permitted us to study the contributions during different levels of inspiratory muscle activity. We used chest movement and volume signals to characterize the bioimpedance signal using linear mixed-effect models and neural networks for each subject and level of muscle activity. The performance was evaluated using the Mean Average Percentage Errors for each respiratory cycle. The lowest errors corresponded to the combination of chest movement and volume for both linear models and neural networks. Particularly, neural networks presented lower errors (median below 4.29%). At high levels of muscle activity, the differences in model performance indicated an increased contribution of chest movement to the bioimpedance signal. Accordingly, chest movement contributed substantially to bioimpedance measurement and more notably at high muscle activity levels.

Highlights

  • Studies included animal testing to explain other changes in thoracic bioimpedance than the changes resulting from respiratory volume

  • The performance was evaluated by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values obtained from the linear models and neural networks

  • Thoracic bioimpedance and respiratory volume were compared in several studies[5,6,7,8,9,10,11], but most of these studies were under normal breathing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studies included animal testing to explain other changes in thoracic bioimpedance than the changes resulting from respiratory volume. The analysis of the temporal relation between the signals revealed delays when loads were imposed[21] These differences in time could be related to differences in thoracic breathing movement and displacement as a result of the increase of the breathing effort and changes in breathing pattern. We measured airflow, thoracic bioimpedance and accelerometer data to study the relation of thoracic bioimpedance with volume and chest motion. This relation was studied though linear mixed-effect models and neural networks by reconstructing bioimpedance signals for different levels of muscle activity as a result of an inspiratory threshold loading protocol. The conclusive results of this study will contribute to better understand of thoracic bioimpedance signal and to reinforce its application for non-invasive respiratory monitoring

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call