Abstract
Bioimpedance has been widely studied as alternative to respiratory monitoring methods because of its linear relationship with respiratory volume during normal breathing. However, other body tissues and fluids contribute to the bioimpedance measurement. The objective of this study is to investigate the relevance of chest movement in thoracic bioimpedance contributions to evaluate the applicability of bioimpedance for respiratory monitoring. We measured airflow, bioimpedance at four electrode configurations and thoracic accelerometer data in 10 healthy subjects during inspiratory loading. This protocol permitted us to study the contributions during different levels of inspiratory muscle activity. We used chest movement and volume signals to characterize the bioimpedance signal using linear mixed-effect models and neural networks for each subject and level of muscle activity. The performance was evaluated using the Mean Average Percentage Errors for each respiratory cycle. The lowest errors corresponded to the combination of chest movement and volume for both linear models and neural networks. Particularly, neural networks presented lower errors (median below 4.29%). At high levels of muscle activity, the differences in model performance indicated an increased contribution of chest movement to the bioimpedance signal. Accordingly, chest movement contributed substantially to bioimpedance measurement and more notably at high muscle activity levels.
Highlights
Studies included animal testing to explain other changes in thoracic bioimpedance than the changes resulting from respiratory volume
The performance was evaluated by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values obtained from the linear models and neural networks
Thoracic bioimpedance and respiratory volume were compared in several studies[5,6,7,8,9,10,11], but most of these studies were under normal breathing
Summary
Studies included animal testing to explain other changes in thoracic bioimpedance than the changes resulting from respiratory volume. The analysis of the temporal relation between the signals revealed delays when loads were imposed[21] These differences in time could be related to differences in thoracic breathing movement and displacement as a result of the increase of the breathing effort and changes in breathing pattern. We measured airflow, thoracic bioimpedance and accelerometer data to study the relation of thoracic bioimpedance with volume and chest motion. This relation was studied though linear mixed-effect models and neural networks by reconstructing bioimpedance signals for different levels of muscle activity as a result of an inspiratory threshold loading protocol. The conclusive results of this study will contribute to better understand of thoracic bioimpedance signal and to reinforce its application for non-invasive respiratory monitoring
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.