Abstract

The CHErenkov/Scintillation Separation experiment (CHESS) has been used to demonstrate the separation of Cherenkov and scintillation light in both linear alkylbenzene (LAB) and LAB with 2 g/L of PPO as a fluor (LAB/PPO). This is the first successful demonstration of Cherenkov light detection from the more challenging LAB/PPO cocktail and improves on previous results for LAB. A time resolution of 338pm 12 ps FWHM results in an efficiency for identifying Cherenkov photons in LAB/PPO of 70 pm 3 % and 63pm 8% for time- and charge-based separation, respectively, with scintillation contamination of 36pm 5% and 38pm 4%. LAB/PPO data is consistent with a rise time of tau _r=0.72pm 0.33 ns.

Highlights

  • The ability to separate Cherenkov and scintillation light in liquid scintillator (LS) detectors would enable a new generation of optical detectors that could achieve directional reconstruction at low energy thresholds, with powerful particle identification and event discrimination capabilities [1]

  • In linear alkylbenzene (LAB) the 48◦ and 6.5-cm target-photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) spacing results in an inner radius for the Cherenkov ring of approximately 7.2 cm, while the additional 3-cm target height puts the outer edge at 10.6 cm

  • The hit-time residual distributions for LAB are shown in Fig. 7 individually for the three radial PMT groupings, for data and Monte Carlo (MC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to separate Cherenkov and scintillation light in liquid scintillator (LS) detectors would enable a new generation of optical detectors that could achieve directional reconstruction at low energy thresholds, with powerful particle identification and event discrimination capabilities [1]. Such a detector would have applications across particle, nuclear, and astrophysics including a next-generation search for neutrinoless double beta decay, unprecedented sensitivity to solar neutrinos, proton decay, and sensitivity to the neutrino mass hierarchy and CP violation if deployed in a neutrino beam [1,2]. 3 introduces the data taking procedure and analysis The results for both target materials are presented in Sect.

The apparatus
Monte Carlo simulation
Data taking and analysis
Calibration
Event selection
Charge and time measurements
Separation in LAB
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.