Abstract

e15200 Background: CT is the main treatment option for patients (pts) with advanced BTC. There is limited randomized data to guide treatment selection. Based on phase 3 data, gemcitabine (G)/cisplatin (C) is an acceptable 1st line CT, but 5-FU based regimens are also used. We reviewed data from our institution to elucidate treatment preferences and responses. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of pts treated at UTSW and PH from Jan 2008 to Dec 2011. Patient lists were obtained from the tumor registry at each hospital from Jan 2008 to Dec 2011. Results: 60 pts had inoperable or metastatic disease. 26/60 pts did not receive CT due to poor functional status. 34/60 pts received 1st-line CT- 26 cholangiocarcinoma, 7 gall bladder cancer, 1 ampullary cancer. 10/34 pts were not evaluated for treatment response due to lack of follow-up. Of the remaining 24 pts, 12 received 2nd line CT. In combined analysis of 1st and 2nd line CT in pts with adequate clinic follow-up, G alone (n=10) or in combination (with C n=9, C+ Cetuximab (CX) n=1, Oxaliplatin n=5, Capecitabine (CAP) n=1, Docetaxel n=1) was the most frequently used CT. 2 pts received CAP with radiation. 6 pts received 5-FU based regimen (FOLFOX n=1, FOLFOX/CX n=1, FOLFIRI n=1, FOLFIRI/CX n=1, FOLFIRI/panitumumab n=2). In 1st line, best response (BR)—partial response (PR) 4 pts, stable disease (SD) 14 pts, progressive disease (PD) 6 pts. Response duration range (RDR) in 1st line was 2-22 months (m). In 2nd line, BR—PR 1 pt, SD 7 pts, PD 2 pts. RDR in 2nd line was 2-10 m. Of the 4 pts who received CT combined with an EGFR inhibitor (EGFRI), 2 had SD, 2 had PR; RDR 3-10 m. Disease control (DC) rate (PR+SD) from 1st line CT 53%, 2nd line CT 67%. All 4 pts who received EGFRI in combination with CT showed evidence of DC. Conclusions: CT is effective in BTC with benefit seen in the majority of treated pts. 43% of pts were unable to receive CT which underscores the poor outlook in this malignancy. Interestingly we noted that even in our small subgroup who received EGFRI based combination CT, there was clinical benefit even in 2nd line CT. There is some published data to support this finding. EGFRI based CT should be further studied in this population.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call