Abstract

The standard Salmonella mutagenicity test uses two strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535 and TA100) containing the same base pair substitution mutation ( hisG46). These strains differ only in that strain TA100 contains the plasmid pKM101, whose mucAB gene products enhance SOS mutagenesis. This makes strain TA100, in general, the more sensitive of the two for mutagen detection, raising the question as to whether or not to include strain TA1535 in the core battery of strains in routine testing. Out of 659 chemicals judged as mutagens in the S. typhimurium assay when subjected to the National Toxicology Program's screening protocol, 36 (5%) were evaluated as positive in strain TA1535 but not in strain TA100. Of these, 23 were judged as negative and 13 as equivocal in strain TA100, and 5 were positive or equivocal in at least one other strain (TA97 or TA98). In general, the data on these chemicals indicate that the absolute increases in revertants per plate induced in strain TA1535 were too small to have been judged as positive if similar increases occurred in strain TA100, which has a much higher spontaneous background. For three chemicals (acetaldehyde oxime, 6-mercaptopurine, and 1,3-butadiene) the absolute increases in revertants in strain TA1535 greatly exceeded those in strain TA100. Evaluation of the reproducibility of these findings and of the mechanisms and relevance of unique TA1535 positives should be useful when decisions are made as to whether this strain should be kept as a part of the core battery of strains in the S. typhimurium assay.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.