Abstract
The chemical Th–U–total Pb isochron method (CHIME) of dating was carried out on monazite, xenotime, zircon, and polycrase in six samples of ultra-high-temperature (UHT) granulites and one of pegmatite from five localities in the Napier Complex, Enderby Land, East Antarctica. Despite the chronological heterogeneity in many grains, the CHIME ages overall show strong evidence for a major event near 2420 Ma. Analyzed monazite and xenotime grains, except monazite from Mt. Riiser-Larsen, have a narrow range of CHIME ages: 2412±42 Ma from Beaver Island and 2429±36, 2421±18 and 2431±22 Ma from Reference Peak. These ages are indistinguishable from CHIME ages on zircon (2436±17 and 2420±20 Ma) and on central older domains of monazite (2404±54 Ma) from Mt. Riiser-Larsen, and on a zircon rim (2430±15 Ma) from Mt. Cronus. We conclude that the ca. 2420 Ma ages relate to the UHT metamorphism, but we do not exclude the possibility that lead loss has lowered the ages by some 50 Ma. This interpretation is consistent with a preponderance of ages obtained by other methods on the Napier Complex particularly the ca. 2475±25 Ma age for a generation of pegmatites coeval with the UHT event and containing the UHT mineral assemblage beryllian sapphirine–khmaralite+quartz. Events prior to 2500 Ma and after 2420 Ma have also left their imprint on the CHIME ages, for example, a 3646 Ma CHIME age suggests that a zircon core is inherited, whereas ca. 2200 and 2000 Ma CHIME ages in zoned monazite could be due to further lead loss during post-UHT activity. The much younger CHIME age of 1094±67 Ma for monazite from a pegmatite at ‘Zircon Point’, Casey Bay, confirms 1000–1100 Ma lead loss ages reported for this region, and could result from fluid activity in an outlier of Rayner activity near the boundary between the Rayner and Napier Complexes. Approximately 2500 Ma ages have been reported from granulite-facies (but not UHT) rocks in the Madras and Nilgiri blocks in South India; these blocks and the Napier Complex could have constituted a single structural unit by late Archean time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.