Abstract

We report in this paper studies on protection against lethality in mice totalbody-irradiated by 440-Mev protons after preirradiation treatment with mercaptoethylamine (MEA) or with p-aminopropiophenone (PAPP), and a comparison with similar effects in mice irradiated by 250-kvp X-rays. MEA and PAPP are known to protect a variety of biological systems against medium-energy and high-energy photon radiation, but their effectiveness against high-energy charged particle radiation has been little studied. For the specific situation of chemical protection of mammals from whole-body high-energy proton radiation, the only work known to the present authors is that of Yarmonenko and associates (1). These workers reported an increased survival in mice irradiated with 660-Mev protons by pretreatment with various mercapto and other coimpounds. Since the time-average spatial distribution of secondary particles resulting from the interaction of high-energy protons with matter is not identical with that resulting from high-energy photon interactions (although the space-average linear energy transfer is about the same), it appeared worth while to compare radioprotection between protectors for a given radiation, and between radiations for a given protector. The two protectors were selected chiefly on the basis of familiarity, and secondarily on the hypothesis (2) that they confer protection by two different but complementary phenomenological mechanisms: MEA by increasing the concentration of active sulfhydryl hydrogen in the cells, PAPP by decreasing the concentration of molecular oxygen in the cells.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call