Abstract

Scents play an important role in the life of most terrestrial mammals and may transmit valuable information about conspecifics. Olfaction was long considered of low importance in Old World monkeys due to their relative reduction of olfactory structures and low incidence of scent-marking behavior but has been increasingly recognized for mediating social relationships in recent years. Yet, studies investigating the composition of their chemical cues remain scarce. In the present study, we analyzed the potential information content of chemicals present on the skin of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). We collected axillary secretions from 60 animals of the semifree-ranging population on Cayo Santiago (Puerto Rico, USA) with precleaned cotton swabs from which the secretions were subsequently extracted and analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Rhesus macaque axillary odorants varied in their overall similarity and composition. This variation was attributable to differences in sex, group membership, and kinship and further appeared to reflect age and rank in parts of our sample. The compounds most strongly associated with this variation primarily comprised larger molecular weight aldehydes and steroids. Such compounds are considered to be perceivable by the primate olfactory system through close-range interactions or through breakdown into smaller molecules by bacterial fermentation. Overall, our results provide additional evidence that odors of Old World monkeys reflect a wealth of potential information about their carrier, which provides the basis for chemical communication via body odors; however, its use by conspecifics needs to be confirmed in bioassays.Significance statementOne prerequisite for olfactory communication is the presence of systematic variation in animal odors that is related to attributes such as age, sex, or kinship. The composition of odors has been examined in numerous mammals but, with the exception of humans, remains poorly understood in Old World monkeys and apes, taxonomic groups in which most species do not show scent-marking behavior. In the present study, we show that the composition of axillary secretions of an Old World monkey, the rhesus macaque, reflects sex, group membership, relatedness, and possibly also age and rank. This variation thus provides a basis for olfactory communication in Old World monkeys.

Highlights

  • Scents are important mediators of social interactions between individuals (Wyatt 2014), with the relevance of olfactory communication for mammalian life being well established

  • We show that the composition of axillary secretions of an Old World monkey, the rhesus macaque, reflects sex, group membership, relatedness, and possibly age and rank

  • This study aimed at investigating the potential information content in the chemical composition of axillary odorants, i.e., the odors emanating from secretions and skin of the axillary region of rhesus macaques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Scents are important mediators of social interactions between individuals (Wyatt 2014), with the relevance of olfactory communication for mammalian life being well established. The information transmitted by these scents has been investigated in numerous studies observing marking behavior and behavioral responses of individuals upon encountering natural or experimentally presented scents (Mares et al 2011; Ghosal et al 2012). In addition to numerous studies on model species in the laboratory (for instance in rodents, see Burger 2005), analyses applying analytical tools such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS; see Charpentier et al 2012) are applied to investigate odor cues in an increasing number of species, settings, and contexts. Odors encode information about species, sex, and reproductive state in spotted and striped hyenas, Crocuta crocuta and Hyaena hyaena (Theis et al 2013); age classes in Iberian wolves, Canis lupus signatus (Martín et al 2010); or colony membership, relatedness, and heterozygosity in Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella (Stoffel et al 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call