Abstract

Coffee is a product whose quality and price are associated with its geographical, genetic and processing origin; therefore, the development of analytical techniques to authenticate the above mentioned is important to avoid adulteration. The objective of this study was to compare conventional analytical methods with NIR technology for the authentication of roasted and ground coffee samples from different producing regions in Mexico (origins) and different varieties. A second objective was to determine, under the same processing conditions, if roasting times can be differentiated by using this technology. A total of 120 samples of roasted and ground commercial coffee were obtained from the states of Chiapas, Oaxaca, Tabasco and Veracruz in Mexico, 30 locally available samples per state. Samples from Veracruz included three different varieties, grown on the same farm and processed under the same conditions. One of these varieties was selected to evaluate the chemical composition of samples roasted at 185 °C using four different roasting times (15, 17, 19 and 21 min). Samples from different producing regions showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in fat content (from 7.45 ± 0.42% in Tabasco to 18.40 ± 2.95% in Chiapas), which was associated with the altitude of coffee plantations (Pearson's r = 0.96). The results indicate that NIR technology generates sufficient useful information to authenticate roasted and ground coffee from different geographical origins in Mexico and different varieties from the same coffee plantation, with similar results to those obtained by conventional analytical methods.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call