Abstract
This article provides a brief survey of the language of betrayal in radical groups and organizations. It compares and contrasts the ways in which radical groups have used the discourse surrounding acts of betrayal — both alleged and proven. The paper contributes to historiographical debate by seeking continuities and discontinuities in the language used by a variety of radical organizations including the Chartists, the Social Democratic Federation and the Independent Labour Party. It extends this debate by comparing these continuities and discontinuities with those in the Australian labour movement: notably at the Eureka rebellion, and in the Victorian labour movement and the Australian Labor Party. The pre-history of the term rat is also traced. The article concludes that there was both continuity and discontinuity in the language of betrayal employed in radical organizations. The language of betrayal reflected the language of the people, shifting as popular culture shifted, but drew, at the same time, on inherent themes of prostitution and faction. A significant theme in the broader issue of trust and distrust in radical organizations emerges: the role of the rat in facilitating change in the aims and agenda of a radical organization, and in uniting those members who remained.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.