Abstract

This study evaluates TimesNet model for stock realized volatility forecasting, comparing its efficacy against traditional and contemporary models across key metrics: RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and QLIKE. Despite TimesNet’s competitive performance in RMSE and QLIKE, it faces challenges in MAE and MAPE, falling behind models like HAR, NBEATSx and NHITS. Highlighting the novel application of CNN architectures beyond image recognition, this research suggests TimesNet’s potential in long-term forecasting and extreme event prediction, yet indicates the necessity for further model enhancement. The findings motivates new avenues for future research into CNN-based forecasting models in stock realized volatility forecasting by improving the current version of the TimesNet model.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.