Abstract

AbstractSub‐monolayer networks of the electron‐transporting semiconducting polymer poly([N,N’‐bis(2‐octyldodecyl)‐naphthalene‐1,4,5,8‐bis(dicarboximide)−2,6‐diyl]‐alt‐5,5′‐(2,2′‐bithiophene)) (P(NDI2OD‐T2)) are realized through judicious choice of spin‐coating solvent and control of solution concentration. These sub‐monolayer networks provide a platform to study the effects of surface coverage, network connectivity, and orientational order on charge transport. It is found that charge transport through semiconducting polymer networks depends not only on the coverage/concentration of the material but also on the nature of the conduction paths themselves. Down to 40% surface coverage, current measured in a field‐effect architecture decreases in line with the decrease in surface coverage, but drops precipitously below a surface coverage of 40%. Below 40% surface coverage, there is a marked decrease in network connectivity (quantified through the branching point density) and a decrease in orientational order. Furthermore, an increase in the density of dangling branches (dead ends) is also seen with decreasing surface coverage. Additional supporting data in the form of grazing incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (GIWAXS), optical spectroscopy, and charge modulation spectroscopy are presented, which help to establish that long‐range interconnectivity rather than local morphology dominates charge transport in P(NDI2OD‐T2) sub‐monolayers as well as thin films.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call