Abstract
Background The use of the term “patient” to describe individuals served by pharmacists may affect expectations, roles, and responsibilities. Whereas this term has been widely accepted and embraced within the profession, there is little empirical evidence to justify its use in the pharmacy practice context. Objectives To describe and characterize the type of relationships that form between community pharmacists and the individuals they serve. Methods A qualitative study was undertaken with pharmacist-volunteers. Participants were asked to maintain a written diary over a 10-day period, in which their workplace experiences were documented. Responses to cued questions as well as free-form notes were analyzed to form a typology. Through successive iterations using confirmatory focus groups consisting of study participants, a final typology was developed. Results A total of 45 pharmacists participated in this study. The final typology describes 5 distinct idealized types of relationships formed by pharmacists: analytic-authoritative, emotive-interactive, opportunistic-expedient, reliant-paternalistic, and autonomous-informative. Conclusions The complexity of practice suggests that the “patient-pharmacist” paradigm for understanding relationships in pharmacy does not adequately capture the variety of day-to-day interactions that pharmacists encounter. Pharmacists engage in a variety of adaptive and responsive strategies to meet expressed and implicit needs of the individuals they serve.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.