Abstract

Abstract. We first validate the performance of the Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS), a small light-weight and high sensitivity optical particle counter, against a reference scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) for a month-long deployment in an environment dominated by biomass burning aerosols. Subsequently, we examine any biases introduced by operating the POPS on a quadcopter drone, a DJI Matrice 200 V2. We report the root mean square difference (RMSD) and mean absolute difference (MAD) in particle number concentrations (PNCs) when mounted on the UAV and operating on the ground and when hovering at 10 m. When wind speeds are low (less than 2.6 m s−1), we find only modest differences in the RMSDs and MADs of 5 % and 3 % when operating at 10 m altitude. When wind speeds are between 2.6 and 7.7 m s−1 the RMSDs and MADs increase to 26.2 % and 19.1 %, respectively, when operating at 10 m altitude. No statistical difference in PNCs was detected when operating on the UAV in either ascent or descent. We also find size distributions of aerosols in the accumulation mode (defined by diameter, d, where 0.1 ≤ d ≤ 1 µm) are relatively consistent between measurements at the surface and measurements at 10 m altitude, while differences in the coarse mode (here defined by d > 1 µm) are universally larger. Our results suggest that the impact of the UAV rotors on the POPS PNCs are small at low wind speeds, but when operating under a higher wind speed of up to 7.6 m s−1, larger discrepancies occur. In addition, it appears that the POPS measures sub-micron aerosol particles more accurately than super-micron aerosol particles when airborne on the UAV. These measurements lay the foundations for determining the magnitude of potential errors that might be introduced into measured aerosol particle size distributions and concentrations owing to the turbulence created by the rotors on the UAV.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric aerosols have a significant impact on Earth’s climate as they affect the radiative balance of the Earth– atmosphere system through the direct effect, which refers to absorption and scattering of solar and terrestrial radiation, Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.Z

  • This variability with height emphasizes the utility of small, instrumented unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for measuring particle number concentrations (PNCs) and particle size distributions (PSDs) at low altitudes; measurements at such altitudes are impossible to probe with heavily equipped atmospheric research aircraft operating under standard aviation safety protocols

  • We have investigated the performance of Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS) against a reference scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) instrument while on the ground and while operated on a quadcopter drone, DJI Matrice 200 V2, which is the first documented test of the performance of a POPS instrument on a UAV

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric aerosols have a significant impact on Earth’s climate as they affect the radiative balance of the Earth– atmosphere system through the direct effect, which refers to absorption and scattering of solar and terrestrial radiation, Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.Z. Liu et al.: Characterizing the performance of a POPS on a quadcopter drone and the indirect effect, which refers to the ability of aerosols to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (Haywood and Boucher, 2000; Boucher et al, 2013) Aerosol concentration and their intrinsic properties are spatially inhomogeneous owing to different emission sources, deposition processes, transports, and chemical reactions Bellouin et al, 2005; Jimenez et al, 2009; Lack and Cappa, 2010; Atkinson et al, 2018; Yim et al, 2019; Yim, 2020) Among these properties, particle size distributions (PSDs) and number concentrations (PNCs) are of fundamental importance in determining the impact of aerosols on the atmospheric radiation budget via the aerosol direct and indirect effects. Dedicated field sites (e.g. Zuidema et al, 2016) or dedicated sampling with aircraft instrumentation (e.g. Haywood et al, 2003a, 2021) are able to make much more detailed aerosol microphysical measurements but are costly, and aircraft cannot sample aerosols at low altitude in built-up urban regions owing to obvious safety concerns

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.