Abstract

In this paper we study the statistical relations between three latent trait models for accuracies and response times: the hierarchical model (HM) of van der Linden (Psychometrika 72(3):287–308, 2007), the signed residual time model (SM) proposed by Maris and van der Maas (Psychometrika 77(4):615–633, 2012), and the drift diffusion model (DM) as proposed by Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (Psychometrika 70(4):629–650, 2005). One important distinction between these models is that the HM and the DM either assume or imply that accuracies and response times are independent given the latent trait variables, while the SM does not. In this paper we investigate the impact of this conditional independence property—or a lack thereof—on the manifest probability distribution for accuracies and response times. We will find that the manifest distributions of the latent trait models share several important features, such as the dependency between accuracy and response time, but we also find important differences, such as in what function of response time is being modeled. Our method for characterizing the manifest probability distributions is related to the Dutch identity (Holland in Psychometrika 55(6):5–18, 1990).

Highlights

  • SigurdardóttirIn this paper we study the statistical relations between three latent trait models for accuracies and response times: the hierarchical model (HM) of van der Linden (Psychometrika 72(3):287–308, 2007), the signed residual time model (SM) proposed by Maris and van der Maas (Psychometrika 77(4):615– 633, 2012), and the drift diffusion model (DM) as proposed by Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (Psychometrika 70(4):629–650, 2005)

  • In this paper we wish to study the statistical relations between three latent trait models for accuracies and response times: the hierarchical model (HM) of van der Linden (2007), the signed residual time model (SM) of Maris and van der Maas (2012), and the drift diffusion model (DM) proposed by Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (2005)

  • The goal of this paper was the statistical comparison of three latent trait models for accuracy and response time: the hierarchical model (HM) of van der Linden (2007), the signed residual time model (SM) of Maris and van der Maas (2012), and the drift diffusion model (DM) as proposed by Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (2005)

Read more

Summary

Sigurdardóttir

In this paper we study the statistical relations between three latent trait models for accuracies and response times: the hierarchical model (HM) of van der Linden (Psychometrika 72(3):287–308, 2007), the signed residual time model (SM) proposed by Maris and van der Maas (Psychometrika 77(4):615– 633, 2012), and the drift diffusion model (DM) as proposed by Tuerlinckx and De Boeck (Psychometrika 70(4):629–650, 2005). In this paper we investigate the impact of this conditional independence property—or a lack thereof—on the manifest probability distribution for accuracies and response times. Our method for characterizing the manifest probability distributions is related to the Dutch identity (Holland in Psychometrika 55(6):5–18, 1990).

Introduction
Models
The Hierarchical Model
The Signed Residual Time Model
The Drift Diffusion Model
Characterizing Manifest Probabilities of Latent Trait Models
The Manifest Probabilities of the Three Latent Trait Models
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call