Abstract

Numerous studies suggest that the transition from Australopithecus to Homo was characterized by evolutionary innovation, resulting in the emergence and coexistence of a diversity of forms. However, the evolutionary processes necessary to drive such a transition have not been examined. Here, we apply statistical tests developed from quantitative evolutionary theory to assess whether morphological differences among late australopith and early Homo species in Africa have been shaped by natural selection. Where selection is demonstrated, we identify aspects of morphology that were most likely under selective pressure, and determine the nature (type, rate) of that selection. Results demonstrate that selection must be invoked to explain an Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition, while transitions from late australopiths to various early Homo species that exclude Au. sediba can be achieved through drift alone. Rate tests indicate that selection is largely directional, acting to rapidly differentiate these taxa. Reconstructions of patterns of directional selection needed to drive the Au. africanus—Au. sediba—Homo transition suggest that selection would have affected all regions of the skull. These results may indicate that an evolutionary path to Homo without Au. sediba is the simpler path and/or provide evidence that this pathway involved more reliance on cultural adaptations to cope with environmental change.

Highlights

  • Recent research proposes that habitat instability and fragmentation acted as important environmental forces driving the evolution and diversification of early Homo [1]

  • The substantial morphological variation in the H. erectus samples from Dmanisi, Georgia (,1.8 Ma), and the mosaic features in the contemporaneous African species Au. sediba (,1.98 Ma), add further weight to the idea that the emergence of our genus was characterized by evolutionary experimentation/innovation resulting in diverse morphology

  • Natural selection has traditionally been given primacy as the driver of morphological change, strong challenges have been mounted against the adaptationist programme in the past few decades [14, 34, 35]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent research proposes that habitat instability and fragmentation acted as important environmental forces driving the evolution and diversification of early Homo [1]. The substantial morphological variation in the H. erectus samples from Dmanisi, Georgia (,1.8 Ma), and the mosaic features in the contemporaneous African species Au. sediba (,1.98 Ma), add further weight to the idea that the emergence of our genus was characterized by evolutionary experimentation/innovation resulting in diverse morphology This increasing recognition of the evolution of early Homo as multi-branched, or bushy [1,2,3,4,5], in turn implies that there are multiple ways to produce early Homo. Quantitative analyses of diversity within Homo – albeit limited – suggest that genetic drift may play an important role in producing evolutionary change [12, 13] Each of these scenarios has important implications relevant to the longstanding debate about the relative importance of neutral versus adaptive evolution in shaping organismal form [14,15,16,17,18]. Determining the role of selection in shaping morphology might allow for recognition of the relative importance of biological versus behavioral adaptation in our lineage

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call