Characterizing positive and negative selection and their phylogenetic effects

Abstract

Total evidence and the use of large datasets to overcome uncertainty are the state of the art in systematic analysis. This assumes that the only true phylogenetic signal is ancestry and that functional, structural, and other factors will not add an alternative signal. Using gene families, where individual codon positions were sorted into bins based upon average-pairwise dN/dS ratio, we show that standard, common phylogenetic methods that were designed for stochastic, neutral, site-independent processes, generate less robust phylogenetic signal for bins with strong negative or positive selection. This was true for phylogenetic reconstruction with parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Further, we present a case for the potential existence of systematic functional or structural signal that competes with ancestral signal. For the example of positive selection, we simulate the evolution of sequences through three dimensional lattice constructs with folding constraint and changing binding functionality and show that total evidence for these lattice genes presents trees with functional signal, but that the neutral synonymous sites in these genes show the true ancestral signal. In this case, sequence convergence is promoted by functional convergence.