Abstract

Nonnative plants are widely recognized as stressors to wetlands and other ecosystems. They may compete with native plant species or communities and alter ecosystem properties, which can affect ecological condition, posing challenges to resource managers. As part of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s National Wetland Condition Assessment (NWCA), we characterized the status of nonnative plants in wetlands across the conterminous United States (US). Our primary goals were to (1) document the composition of nonnative taxa at 1138 NWCA sites sampled in 2011 and (2) estimate the areal extent of wetland under stress from nonnative plants within the NWCA 2011 sampled population of ~ 25 million ha of wetland (represented by 967 sampled probability sites and the NWCA survey design). A total of 443 unique nonnative taxa were observed, encompassing a species pool adapted to diverse ecological conditions. For individual sites, the number of nonnative taxa ranged from 0 to 29, and total absolute cover of nonnatives ranged from 0 to 160%. We devised the nonnative plant indicator (NNPI) as a categorical indicator of stress (low to very high) from the collective set of nonnative plant taxa occurring at a particular location, based on a decision matrix of exceedance values for nonnative richness, relative frequency, and relative cover. Wetland area of the sampled population occurring in each NNPI category was estimated at the scale of the conterminous US and within five large ecoregions and four broad wetland types. Potential stress from nonnative plants, as indicated by the NNPI category, was low for approximately 61% (~ 15.3 million ha), moderate for about 20% (~ 5.2 million ha), high for about 10% (~ 2.48 million ha), and very high for about 9% (~ 2.2 million ha) of the wetland area in the entire sampled population. Percent of wetland area with high and very high NNPI varied by ecoregional subpopulations: greater within interior and western ecoregions (~ 29 to 87%) than within ecoregions in the eastern half of the nation (~ 11%). Among wetland type subpopulations, greater percent of wetland area with high and very high NNPI was observed for herbaceous vs. woody types and for inland vs. estuarine types. Estimates of wetland area by NNPI categories are expected to be useful to policy makers or resource managers for prioritizing management actions by identifying situations where stress from nonnative plants is most extensive. We also considered four exploratory analyses aimed at providing ecological information useful in interpreting NNPI extent results. We conducted three population-scale analyses examining ecoregional and wetland type population means for (1) the three NNPI metrics, (2) absolute cover of growth-habit groups of nonnative plants, and (3) metrics describing human-mediated disturbance. Finally, we examined ecological relationships with site-level NNPI status using a random forest (RF) analysis with NNPI as the response variable and predictor variables including ecoregion, wetland type, and a variety of characteristics describing natural vegetation structure, environment, and human-mediated disturbance.

Highlights

  • Nonnative plants are recognized as important indicators of stress to wetlands and other ecosystems (Mack and Kentula 2010; Magee et al 2010; Schweiger et al 2016)

  • We evaluate how population-scale means for (1) the three individual nonnative plant indicator (NNPI) metrics, (2) growth-habit groups of nonnative plants, and (3) human-mediated disturbances might parallel NNPI stressor-level extent results

  • It characterizes the status of nonnative plants in wetlands for a sampled population representing approximately 25 million ha of wetland and allows results to be viewed at a variety of scales, e.g., nationally, or for major ecoregional and wetland type subpopulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nonnative plants are recognized as important indicators of stress to wetlands and other ecosystems (Mack and Kentula 2010; Magee et al 2010; Schweiger et al 2016) Their presence, richness, and abundance are often positively related to stressors of ecological condition caused by human-mediated disturbances (e.g., physical disturbances to vegetation or ground surface, changes in hydrology, nutrient inputs, changes in surrounding land use, and inadvertent introduction) (Lozon and MacIsaac 1997; Magee et al 1999; Mack et al 2000; Magee and Kentula 2005; Aguiar et al 2007; Ringold et al 2008; Jakubowski et al 2014). Ecological impacts from nonnative species can occur at the levels of organism (e.g., fitness, mortality, growth), species population (e.g., abundance, genetics), plant community (e.g., species richness, species composition, structure), ecosystem (e.g., physical habitat, nutrient cycling), or region (Simberloff 2011; Vilà et al 2011; Ricciardi et al 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call