Abstract

AbstractGeological disposal facilities (GDF) are intended to isolate and contain radioactive waste within multiple protective barriers, deep underground, to ensure that no harmful quantities of radioactivity reach the surface environment. The last line of defense in a multi-barrier GDF is the geosphere, where iron is present in the host rock mineralogy as either Fe(II) or Fe(III), and in groundwater as Fe(II) under reducing conditions. The mobility of risk-driving radionuclides, including uranium and technetium, in the environment is affected significantly by their valence state. Due to its low redox potential, Fe(II) can mediate reduction of these radionuclides from their oxidized, highly mobile, soluble state to their reduced, insoluble state, preventing them from reaching the biosphere. Here a study of five types of potential host rocks, two granitoids, an andesite, a mudstone and a clay-rich carbonate, is reported. The bulk rocks and their minerals were analysed for iron content, Fe(II/III) ratio, and for the speciation and fine-grained nature of alteration product minerals that might have important controls on groundwater interaction. Total iron content varies between 0.9% in clays to 5.6% in the andesite. X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals that Fe in the granitoids and andesite is predominantly Fe(II), and in mudstones, argillaceous limestone and terrestrial sandstone is predominantly Fe(III). The redox reactivity of the potential host rocks both in the presence and absence of Fe(II)-containing 'model' groundwater was investigated using an azo dye as a probe molecule. Reduction rates as determined by reactivity with the azo dye were correlated with the ability of the rocks to uptake Fe(II) from groundwater rather than with initial Fe(II) content. Potential GDF host rocks must be characterized in terms of mineralogy, texture, grain size and bulk geochemistry to assess how they might interact with groundwater. This study highlights the importance of redox reactivity, not just total iron and Fe(II)/(III) ratio, when considering the host rock performance as a barrier material to limit transport of radionuclides from the GDF.

Highlights

  • THE UK government has set out a framework for the long-term management of high activity radioactive waste in a geological disposal facility (GDF) in the recent white paper by the Department of Energy & Climate Change (2014)

  • As a site has not yet been selected for a UK GDF, the screening of potential candidate host lithologies is essential to support the implementation of geological disposal by Radioactive Waste Management (RWM) Ltd

  • X-ray maps of pervasively altered primary feldspars show compositional heterogeneities on a lengthscale of ∼3–10 μm which matches the sizes of clay minerals and interlayered grains of mica – chlorite – clay formed by low-temperature alteration of igneous rocks (Peters and Hofmann, 1984; Psyrillos et al, 1999)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As a site has not yet been selected for a UK GDF, the screening of potential candidate host lithologies is essential to support the implementation of geological disposal by Radioactive Waste Management (RWM) Ltd. Important geospheric aspects for the GDF site selection process include choosing the type of rock, defining the mineralogy and its reactivity, especially the presence of redox active phases, and the nature of fine-grained alteration products (very large surface areas). Important geospheric aspects for the GDF site selection process include choosing the type of rock, defining the mineralogy and its reactivity, especially the presence of redox active phases, and the nature of fine-grained alteration products (very large surface areas) Redox active elements, such as iron, present within the rock, can influence the oxidation state of long-lived radioactive elements including uranium, plutonium, technetium and neptunium, which determines their solubility and, their mobility in the environment. Samples were prepared by mounting 0.3 g powder in a fused quartz tube

Experimental Methods
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call