Abstract
Morphological characterization of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) is critically important to process control in production and product specification for trade and product development yet is extremely difficult. This study evaluated several indirect methods for relative comparison of the morphology of lignin-free and lignin-containing ((L)MFCs). The (L)MFCs studied were produced using a commercial grinder through different passes from a dry lap bleached kraft eucalyptus pulp, a virgin mixed (maple and birch) unbleached kraft hardwood pulp, and two virgin-unbleached kraft softwood (loblolly pine) pulps with one bleachable grade (low lignin content) and one liner grade (high lignin content). The (L)MFCs were indirectly characterized using techniques based on water interactions, i.e., water retention value (WRV) and fibril suspension stability, as well as fibril properties, i.e., cellulose crystallinity and fine content. Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were also applied to directly visualize the (L)MFCs to provide some objective measure of the morphology of the (L)MFCs. The results indicate that most measures such as WRV, cellulose crystallinity, fine content cannot be used to compare (L)MFCs from different pulp fibers. Measures based on water interactions such as (L)MFC WRV and suspension stability appeared can provide some degree of indirect assessment. This study provided the utilities and limits of these indirect methods for relative comparison of the morphologies of (L)MFCs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.