Characterizing Errors Using Satellite Metadata for Eco‐Hydrological Model Calibration

Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding the origins of errors between model predictions and catchment observations is a critical element in hydrologic model calibration and uncertainty estimation. Difficulties arise because there are a variety of error sources but only one measure of the total residual error between model predictions and catchment observations. One promising approach is to collect extra information a priori to characterize the data error before calibration. We implement here a new model calibration strategy for an ecohydrological model, using the satellite metadata information as a means to inform the model priors, to decompose data error from total residual error. This approach, referred to as Bayesian ecohydrological error model (BEEM), is first examined in a synthetic setting to establish its validity, and then applied to three real catchments across Australia. Results show that (a) BEEM is valid in a synthetic setting, as it can perfectly ascertain the true underlying error; (b) in real catchments the model error is reduced when utilizing the observation error variance as added error contributing to total error variance, while the magnitude of total residual error is more robust when utilizing metadata about the data quality proportionality as the basis for assigning total error variance; (c) BEEM improves model calibration by estimating the model error appropriately and estimating the uncertainty interval more precisely. Overall, our work demonstrates a new approach to collect prior error information in satellite metadata and reveals the potential for fully utilizing metadata about error sources in uncertainty estimation.