Abstract

Buoys provide key observations of wind speed over the ocean and are routinely used as a source of validation data for satellite wind products. However, the movement of buoys in high seas and the airflow over waves might cause inaccurate readings, raising concern when buoys are used as a source of wind speed comparison data. The relative accuracy of buoy winds is quantified through a triple collocation (TC) exercise comparing buoy winds to winds from ASCAT and ERA5. Differences between calibrated buoy winds and ASCAT are analyzed through separating the residuals by anemometer height and testing under high wind-wave and swell conditions. First, we converted buoy winds measured near 3, 4, and 5 m to stress-equivalent winds at 10 m (U10S). Buoy U10S from anemometers near 3 m compared notably lower than buoy U10S from anemometers near 4 and 5 m, illustrating the importance of buoy choice in comparisons with remote sensing data. Using TC calibration of buoy U10S to ASCAT in pure wind-wave conditions, we found that there was a small, but statistically significant difference between height adjusted buoy winds from buoys with 4 and 5 m anemometers compared to the same ASCAT wind speed ranges in high seas. However, this result does not follow conventional arguments for wave sheltering of buoy winds, whereby the lower anemometer height winds are distorted more than the higher anemometer height winds in high winds and high seas. We concluded that wave sheltering is not significantly affecting the winds from buoys between 4 and 5 m with high confidence for winds under 18 ms−1. Further differences between buoy U10S and ASCAT winds are observed in high swell conditions, motivating the need to consider the possible effects of sea state on ASCAT winds.

Highlights

  • triple collocation (TC) calibration of buoy U10S to ASCAT in pure wind-wave conditions, we found that there was a small, but statistically significant difference between height adjusted buoy winds from buoys with 4 and 5 m anemometers compared to the same ASCAT wind speed ranges in high seas

  • To quantify the effects of sea state on comparisons of ASCAT and buoy winds, we converted raw buoy winds and ERA5 FG winds to U10S and performed TC calibration using ASCAT as a reference dataset

  • By isolating the conditions to wind seas, we found that wave height has a marginal effect on the height adjusted winds speed differences of buoys with 4- and 5-m anemometer heights using ASCAT as the reference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. An alternative study used surface air pressure data with buoys as input into a numerical model to infer a low bias for buoy winds at high wind speeds, and did not account for sea state effects [5]. After comparing scatterometer winds to buoy U10S , variability between ASCAT and buoys can be assessed for possible errors caused by flow distortion and sea state effects, but additional systematic errors due to differences in measurement scales must be accounted for because we cannot assume that the two sets of observations are perfectly intercalibrated.

Locations
Buoy Validation Parameters
High Wind Speed Comparisons
Bin averages of wind speed rawcompared buoy winds and buoy
Residual Analysis with Sea State
12. Triple
Wind-Wave Flow Distortion
Swell Wave Effects
Other Sources of Comparison Error
Platform Airflow Distortion
Triple Collocation
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call