Abstract

The cereal often dominates the grain legume in intercrops, especially when sown in larger amounts. This study assessed yield formation of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) in an intercropping system in high-latitude conditions. Three pea cultivars (Hulda, Karita and Perttu) and one oat cultivar (Roope) were grown as sole crops and intercrops with shares of either 7.5% or 15% of oat (as weight of sown seed mixture). Experiments were organized in three (southern, western and northern) locations of Finland for three years. Yield and vegetative above-ground biomass, their land equivalent ratio (LER, i.e., the yield in intercrop compared to that of the component yields in pure stands), and a number of yield components were measured prior to harvest at crop-stand and single-plant levels. The share of oat in the intercrop did not have any impact on variation in LERyield. Oat yield and yield components generally benefitted from a pea companion crop. The pea cultivar Perttu was superior in intercrops: it had a LERyield>1 in seven out of eight experiments (mean LERyield=1.06), while Karita had a LERyield>1 in four (mean LERyield=1.00) and Hulda only in one experiment (mean LERyield=0.98). Perttu proved to be a compatible pea companion for a pea-oat intercrop, likely because it was successful in overcompensating for decline in relative yield (RGY) of oat in intercrops, contrary to Hulda. However, none of the measured yield components of Perttu were associated with LERyield, suggesting compensation ability between them, while in Karita and Hulda, e.g., higher grain yield and number of grains and pods per square meter were associated with decline in LERyield. It was concluded that the success of Perttu as a companion for oat in intercrops is likely attributable to its flexibility in building yield through a variable combination of yield components rather than being outperformed due to some superior traits. Such flexibility, likely attributable to long duration of flowering supports resilience to weather variability that is typical for northern European conditions allowing Perttu to consistently sustain a LERyield >1.

Highlights

  • Grain legumes provide many valuable ecosystem services for agriculture, which supports the aim to expand their cultivation and explore their potential for development of more sustainable agricultural systems

  • The share of oat in the intercrop did not have any impact on variation in LERyield (

  • Pea cultivars performed differently when intercropped with oat, and growing conditions had a marked impact as they explained some 32% of the variation in LERyield and even 87% in intercropped GYs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Grain legumes provide many valuable ecosystem services for agriculture, which supports the aim to expand their cultivation and explore their potential for development of more sustainable agricultural systems They provide the means to diversify cropping systems that are currently dominated by cereal monocultures in Finland (Peltonen-Sainio et al 2017) and benefit from nitrogen (N) fixation capacity. These and many other ecosystem services provided by grain legumes may lead to a decrease in dependency on fossil fuel-consuming input use, increase in production of crop-based protein and long-term improvements in resilience against climatic variability through diversified cropping systems in high-latitude conditions (Peltonen-Sainio et al 2016a). Pea exhibits high variation in yield and quality at high latitudes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call