Abstract
AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) provide financial support for medical care for people living with HIV (PLWH) in the United States. Federal policy requires that clients recertify for the program every 6 months, which has been described as a barrier to care access. Our objective was to describe the prevalence of and factors associated with ADAP disenrollment in Washington State. Between 2017 and 2019, we categorized ADAP clients by the success of their recertification applications as follows: (1) continuously enrolled, (2) ruled ineligible, or (3) disenrolled if they failed to recertify. We compared individuals who were disenrolled with those who were continuously enrolled by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and engagement with case management using data from the Washington State HIV Surveillance and Ryan White data systems. From 2017 to 2019, 5480 clients were enrolled in ADAP, of whom 1423 (26%) were disenrolled and 984 (18%) were ruled ineligible at least once. Compared with those who were continuously enrolled, disenrolled PLWH were more likely to be Black [unadjusted prevalence ratio (PR) vs White 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17 to 1.46], uninsured (PR vs private insurance 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.40), and younger (PR 25-34 vs 35-44 years 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.41). The median time to return after disenrollment was 12 months (95% CI: 8 to 19 months). Disenrollment after failure to recertify was the most common reason why PLWH lost ADAP coverage in Washington State. ADAP recertification procedures disproportionately affect Black, young, and uninsured PLWH and may contribute to disparities in HIV outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.