Abstract

The aroma compounds in young and aged Chinese rice wines (rice wines) with a clear difference in their overall aroma profiles were analyzed by comparative aroma extract dilution analysis (cAEDA). In AEDA, more aroma-active regions with flavor dilution (FD) factors of ≥64 were detected in the aged rice wine than in the young rice wine. A total of 43 odorants were further identified and quantitated. The odor activity values (OAVs) revealed 33 aroma compounds with OAVs of ≥1 in young or aged rice wine. Among these aroma compounds with relatively higher OAVs, 3-methylbutanoic acid, 1,1-diethoxyethane, vanillin, 3-methylbutanal, sotolon, benzaldehyde, 4-vinylguaiacol, methional, and 2,3-butanedione showed significant differences between young and aged rice wines. This difference was confirmed through a quantitative analysis of 34 rice wine samples with ages of 0-15 years. Then, the aroma profile of the aged rice wine was successfully simulated through an aroma recombination model. Omission models suggested that sotolon, vanillin, 3-methylbutanal, and benzaldehyde played key roles in the overall aroma of aged rice wine.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call