Abstract

The activated sludge process generates an endogenous residue (X E) as a result of heterotrophic biomass decay (X H). A literature review yielded limited information on the differences between X E and X H in terms of chemical composition and content of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The objective of this project was to characterize the chemical composition ( x, y, z, a, b and c in C x H y O z N a P b S c ) of the endogenous and the active fractions and EPS of activated sludge from well designed experiments. To isolate X H and X E in this study, activated sludge was generated in a 200 L pilot-scale aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) fed with a soluble and completely biodegradable synthetic influent of sodium acetate as the sole carbon source. This influent, which contained no influent unbiodegradable organic or inorganic particulate matter, allowed the generation of a sludge composed essentially of two fractions: heterotrophic biomass X H and an endogenous residue X E, the nitrifying biomass being negligible. The endogenous decay rate and the active biomass fraction of the MBR sludge were determined in 21-day aerobic digestion batch tests by monitoring the VSS and OUR responses. Fractions of X H and X E were respectively 68% and 32% in run 1 (MBR at 5.2 day SRT) and 59% and 41% in run 2 (MBR at 10.4 day SRT). The endogenous residue was isolated by subjecting the MBR sludge to prolonged aerobic batch digestion for 3 weeks, and was characterized in terms of (a) elemental analysis for carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur; and (b) content of EPS. The MBR sludge was characterized using the same procedures (a and b). Knowing the proportions of X H and X E in this sludge, it was possible to characterize X H by back calculation. Results from this investigation showed that the endogenous residue had a chemical composition different from that of the active biomass with a lower content of inorganic matter (1:4.2), of nitrogen (1:2.9), of phosphorus (1:5.3) and of sulphur (1:3.2) but a similar content of carbon (1:0.98). Based on these elemental analyses, chemical composition formulae for X H and X E were determined as CH 1.240O 0.375N 0.200P 0.0172S 0.0070 and CH 1.248O 0.492N 0.068P 0.0032S 0.0016, respectively. Data from EPS analyses also confirmed this difference in structure between X E and X H with an EPS content of 11–17% in X E versus 26–40% in X H.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.