Abstract
Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) recordings were made from 38 humans implanted with one of three cochlear prostheses, and from 25 cats. Recognizable auditory potentials were identified in 27 of the profoundly deaf implanted subjects. In both cats and humans EABR waveform morphology and magnitude were independent of electrode configuration and paralleled those of the normal acoustic ABR, but with reduced absolute latencies. EABR recordings are highly susceptible to contamination by stimulus artifact and by elicited non-auditory potentials. Latency, morphology, and magnitude criteria are proposed for identification and analysis of EABR components.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
