Abstract

A comparison between scanning tunneling microscope (STM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) nanolithography techniques based on local oxidation of silicon is proposed. This work deals with the three different near-field microscopy techniques, namely, STM, AFM in contact mode (CM-AFM), and tapping mode (TM-AFM), all of them operated in air. The thickness and width of oxide stripes are studied as a function of the applied probe–sample voltage, the speed of the probe and the setpoint (current, applied force, and vibration amplitude for STM, AFM contact, and tapping, respectively). The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are analyzed, establishing TM-AFM as the best candidate for scanning probe microscope nanolithography.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.