Abstract

Changes in aroma of apple harvested at four different maturities were measured at harvest and after short-term storage using electronic aroma sensors ("electronic nose") and classical headspace/gas chromatography methods. Stored fruits were also evaluated by a trained sensory panel. Compared with headspace/gas chromatography, the electronic nose was found to be more sensitive ( approximately 40 times) in terms of sample size. The sampling procedure for the electronic nose was much less complex. Using discriminant function analysis, both methods classified the apples tested into groups according to harvest date. After storage, the groupings were more diffuse. Results from sensory testing showed partial separation along the first linear discriminant but did not classify the apple into distinct groups. Important differences between treatments were found for "overall flavor", "acid flavor" intensity, "crispness", "cider/fermented aroma", "vegetative aroma", and "canned pear aroma".

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.