Abstract

Abstract This paper describes results of an experimental program to reduce uncertainties associated with the thermal-hydraulic design and analysis of LMFBR blanket assemblies. These assemblies differ significantly from fuel assemblies in design detail and operating conditions. In blanket assemblies, heat transfer occurs over a wide range of complex operating conditions. The range and complexity of conditions are the result of flux and power gradients which are an inherent feature of the blanket region and the power generation level in an assembly which can vary from 20 kW to ∼ 2 MW. To provide effective cooling of all assemblies and economical operation, coolant is metered to groups of assemblies in proportion to their ultimate power level. As a result, the assembly flow can be in the laminar, transition or turbulent range. Because of the wide range of heat generation rates and the range of coolant flow velocities, heat transfer from rods to coolant may take place in the forced, natural or mixed convection mode. Under low flow conditions, buoyancy affects the flow pattern in the bundle, and thus, alters the temperature distribution. The complexities are further compounded since, in addition to temperature gradients within an assembly, there are also significant temperature differences between adjacent assemblies. This results in heat transfer by conduction between adjacent assemblies, which tends to further distort flow and temperature patterns. Since these effects cannot be accurately predicted analytically, full-size radial blanket assembly heat transfer tests are being conducted using electrically heated fuel rod simulators in flowing sodium. A 61-rod electrically heated radial blanket assembly mockup of prototypic dimensions was designed, constructed and installed in a 200 gpm (45 m 3 /hr) sodium test loop. Heat transfer tests are being conducted over a wide range of power and sodium flow rates with this full-scale, vertical, electrical-resistance-heated rod bundle. The rod bundle is extensively instrumented by thermocouples located at six distinct elevations in the wire wrap and inside the heater cladding. Tests were conducted covering the flow range from fully turbulent to fully laminar with approximately constant power-to-flow ratio. The power input patterns included across bundle gradients of 2.8 to 1 and 2.0 to 1 maximum to minimum, uniform power input to all rods and a dished distribution with low power in the central row and high power in the two rows of rods adjacent to the duct walls. The test program provided experimentally measured axial and transverse temperature profiles for the test model over a range of anticipated plant operating conditions. The data were used to (a) determine the effect of Reynolds Number, power gradients and power-to-flow ratio on transverse and axial temperature profiles and particularly on peak and peripheral channel temperatures; (b) determine the effect of inter-assembly heat transfer on peak temperatures and temperature distributions; and (c) determine the effect of buoyancy on temperature profiles.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call