Abstract
Horizontal drilling in combination with hydraulic fracturing has been successfully used to efficiently and effectively exploit tight oil/ gas reservoirs where a multibranched fracture network may be generated near a horizontal well which has been confirmed with microseismic events (MSE). Due to their inherent constraints, limited attempts have been made to characterize such complex fracture networks at an individual fracturing stage using tracer flowback tests. In this work, numerical models have been developed, validated, and applied to describe the tracer flowback behavior and characterize the complex fractal-like discrete fracture networks in a tight formation. To be specific, the embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) is employed to accurately capture the fracture geometry by first discretizing the fractures into various segments and then incorporating such discretized fractures into the matrix. The perpendicular bisector (PEBI) grids are then generated to flexibly conform to the fractures and reduce the grid orientation effects. Subsequently, a reservoir with complex fracture networks is discretized into two separate domains (i.e. matrix and fracture), while nonneighboring connections (NNCs) which can provide fluid communications between the two domains are applied to couple the matrix and embedded fractures. Furthermore, the tracer flowback profiles, which can reveal the complexity of fractal-like discrete fracture networks, are quantified by considering tracer advection, dispersion, and adsorption. Sensitivity analysis has been conducted to examine the effects of iteration number, branch number, deviation angle, scale factor, and the ratio of permeabilities of two cluster fractures on the tracer flowback concentration curves. It is found that the iteration number will greatly affect the tracer flowback concentration, while the deviation angle imposes a minor effect on tracer flowback behavior. An increase in both the branch number and scale factor will decrease the tracer flowback concentration. Two concentration peaks will appear when the permeabilities of the two cluster fractures are different. The larger the difference between the permeabilities of the two cluster fractures is, the greater the difference in the peak arrival time and the peak amplitude will be. In addition, the newly proposed model was verified and then applied to a field case to characterize the complex fractal-like fracture networks, which are confirmed with the microseismic events.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.