Abstract

Background: Enterococci are considered as the third most common cause of nosocomial infections. Enterococci acquire antibiotic resistance by gene transfer. Virulence factors facilitate colonization and evasion from the immune system. Our objectives were to evaluate the distribution of virulence markers and genes among Enterococci isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) in Sohag University Hospital and to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of enterococci. Methods: Virulence markers were detected by gelatinase test, caseinase test, slime layer production and modified micro titer plate method. PCR is used for identification of enterococcal species and detection of virulence genes as gel E, asa 1, esp, hyl and cyl A. Antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed by disc diffusion method by using ampicillin, vancomycin, tetracycline, erythromycin and teichoplanin. Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured by E-test. Results: Vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) was detected in 38.4 % of isolates. There was no significant difference in the distribution of all virulence markers between E. faecalis and E. faecium. The hyl gene was more commonly detected in E. faecalis (p-value= 0.01). Enterococci isolated from cases of surgical site infection (SSI) , pneumonia and sepsis contain multiple virulence genes with the highest percentage. Vancomycin resistance was higher in gel E positive and asa1 positive E. faecalis than negative E. faecalis. Conclusion: Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was detected in 57.6% of Enterococci. E. faecalis and E. faecium have the same degree of virulence. An association was noted between the esp & asa 1 genes and biofilm formation.

Highlights

  • There are many species of enterococci which can produce infections in human, Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis) is the commonest species with the highest virulence followed by Enterococcus faecium (E.faecium) which exhibits multidrug resistance (MDR) pattern and high prevalence [1].Enterococci show intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics as cephalosporins, Fahmy N et al / Microbes and Infectious Diseases 2021; 2(4): 725-735 726 sulphonamides and aminoglycosides [2]

  • 52 isolates of enterococci were identified by colony morphology on bile esculin azide agar (BEA) agar and their ability to grow in presence of NaCl 6.5%

  • E. faecalis was identified as the major cause of enterococcal infections, the frequency of vancomycin resistant E. faecalis was higher than vancomycin resistant E. faecium, which is consistent with Sabouni et al [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are many species of enterococci which can produce infections in human, Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis) is the commonest species with the highest virulence followed by Enterococcus faecium (E.faecium) which exhibits multidrug resistance (MDR) pattern and high prevalence [1].Enterococci show intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics as cephalosporins, Fahmy N et al / Microbes and Infectious Diseases 2021; 2(4): 725-735 726 sulphonamides and aminoglycosides [2]. There are many species of enterococci which can produce infections in human, Enterococcus faecalis (E.faecalis) is the commonest species with the highest virulence followed by Enterococcus faecium (E.faecium) which exhibits multidrug resistance (MDR) pattern and high prevalence [1]. Vancomycin and teicoplanin are important therapeutic options against MDR strain of enterococci, so resistance to these antibiotics is of great and special concern. Our objectives were to evaluate the distribution of virulence markers and genes among enterococci isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) in Sohag University Hospital and to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of enterococci. Polymerase chain reaction is used for identification of enterococcal species and detection of virulence genes as gel E, asa 1, esp, hyl and cyl A. Results: Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) was detected in 38.4 % of isolates. An association was noted between the esp & asa 1 genes and biofilm formation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call