Abstract

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a leading multi-attribute decision-aiding model that is designed to help make better choices when faced with complex decisions involving several dimensions. AHP, which enables qualitative analysis using a combination of subjective and objective information, is a multiple criteria decision analysis approach that uses hierarchical structured pairwise comparisons. One of the drawbacks of AHP is that a pairwise comparison cannot be completed by an actor or stakeholder not fully familiar with all the aspects of the problem. The authors have developed a completion based on a process of linearization that minimizes the matrix distance defined in terms of the Frobenius norm (a strictly convex minimization problem). In this paper, we characterize when an incomplete, positive, and reciprocal matrix can be completed to become a consistent matrix. We show that this characterization reduces the problem to the solution of a linear system of equations—a straightforward procedure. Various properties of such a completion are also developed using graph theory, including explicit calculation formulas. In real decision-making processes, facilitators conducting the study could use these characterizations to accept an incomplete comparison body given by an actor or to encourage the actor to further develop the comparison for the sake of consistency.

Highlights

  • The so-called analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1, 2] has been accepted as a leading multiattribute decision-aiding model both by practitioners and academicians, since it is designed to make better choices when faced with complex decisions involving several dimensions

  • In a real participatory decision making (DM) process, the facilitator in charge of conducting the study may have to face an incomplete body of opinion given by an actor

  • There has been a significant growth in multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) applications in many fields, including decision support tools [24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The so-called analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1, 2] has been accepted as a leading multiattribute decision-aiding model both by practitioners and academicians, since it is designed to make better choices when faced with complex decisions involving several dimensions. The consistent completion of a reciprocal matrix as a mechanism to obtain a consistent body of opinion issued in an incomplete manner by a specific actor was addressed This feature can help stakeholders not fully problem acquainted participate in processes. In a real participatory DM process, the facilitator in charge of conducting the study may have to face an incomplete body of opinion given by an actor In this event, he or she needs robust criteria to either accept the opinion or encourage the actor to further develop the comparison so that the judgment is eventually completed consistently, helping ensure an optimal decision. We provide a solution to this issue by solving the following problem: to characterize when an incomplete, positive, reciprocal matrix can be completed to become a consistent matrix.

Prerequisites and Formal Statement of the Problem
Characterization of the Completion of a Reciprocal Matrix
Completion of Reciprocal Matrices and Graph Theory
Application to Leakage Control in a Water Supply System
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call