Characterization of cold metal transfer and conventional short-circuit gas metal arc welding processes for depositing tungsten carbide-reinforced metal matrix composite overlays

Abstract

This paper compares the processing characteristics of advanced CMT (cold metal transfer) and conventional GMAW-S (gas metal arc welding with short-circuit metal transfer) processes for depositing Ni-WC MMC (nickel-based metal matrix composites reinforced with WC) overlays. In contrast to common expectations, advanced CMT technology with mechanically assisted droplet transfer could not demonstrate significant advantages over the GMAW-S process; on the contrary, CMT exhibits marginal disadvantages in terms of carbide transfer efficiency, volume fraction of retained WC, and deposition rate. Some carbides originally contained in the core of the feed wire are blown away and expelled out of the processing zone leading to physical losses of WC particles during the deposition processes, which is more significant for the CMT process owing to much higher waveform cycle frequency and cyclic feed wire retractions. CMT exhibits superior waveform stability, better control over penetration depth, marginally lower dilution level, and exceptional arc stability. The main parameters affecting carbide transfer efficiency and volume fraction of retained WC are wire feed speed and travel speed for both processes; increased wire feed speed and travel speed generally lead to decreased carbide transfer efficiency and reduced volume fraction of retained WC. Shielding gas may have different effects on the outcomes for the CMT and GMAW-S processes. CMT overlays show comparatively higher W and lower Fe concentration in the matrix, while GMAW-S overlays show a higher concentration of Fe in the matrix (due to elevated dilution level) with marginally higher matrix microhardness and more herringbone-like secondary carbide precipitates.