Abstract

BackgroundDespite the greater sensitivity of the new dengue clinical classification proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2009, there is a need for a better definition of warning signs and clinical progression of dengue cases. Classic statistical methods have been used to evaluate risk criteria in dengue patients, however they usually cannot access the complexity of dengue clinical profiles. We propose the use of machine learning as an alternative tool to identify the possible characteristics that could be used to develop a risk criterion for severity in dengue patients.MethodIn this study, we analyzed the clinical profiles of 523 confirmed dengue cases using self-organizing maps (SOM) and random forest algorithms to identify clusters of patients with similar patterns.ResultsWe identified four natural clusters, two with features of dengue without warning signs or mild disease, one that comprises the severe dengue cases and high frequency of warning signs, and another with intermediate characteristics. Age appeared as the key variable for splitting the data into these four clusters although warning signs such as abdominal pain or tenderness, clinical fluid accumulation, mucosal bleeding, lethargy, restlessness, liver enlargement and increased hematocrit associated with a decrease in platelet counts should also be considered to evaluate severity in dengue patients.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that age must be the first characteristic to be considered in places where dengue is hyperendemic. Our results show that warning signs should be closely monitored, mainly in children. Further studies exploring these results in a longitudinal approach may help to understand the full spectrum of dengue clinical manifestations.

Highlights

  • Despite the greater sensitivity of the new dengue clinical classification proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2009, there is a need for a better definition of warning signs and clinical progression of dengue cases

  • Age appeared as the key variable for splitting the data into these four clusters warning signs such as abdominal pain or tenderness, clinical fluid accumulation, mucosal bleeding, lethargy, restlessness, liver enlargement and increased hematocrit associated with a decrease in platelet counts should be considered to evaluate severity in dengue patients

  • Further studies exploring these results in a longitudinal approach may help to understand the full spectrum of dengue clinical manifestations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite the greater sensitivity of the new dengue clinical classification proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2009, there is a need for a better definition of warning signs and clinical progression of dengue cases. Classic statistical methods have been used to evaluate risk criteria in dengue patients, they usually cannot access the complexity of dengue clinical profiles. We propose the use of machine learning as an alternative tool to identify the possible characteristics that could be used to develop a risk criterion for severity in dengue patients. Most infections by DENV result in a mild disease known as dengue without warning signs, but a small proportion of patients develop the severe form [1]. Classic statistical methods have been used to evaluate warning signs and determine risk criteria for severity in dengue patients [7,8,9], the complexity of the clinical profiles and the many overlapping levels of severity makes the disease prognosis nearly impossible to Macedo Hair et al BMC Infectious Diseases (2019) 19:649 predict. A general extension of this idea is a stochastic version of SOM that can be used to analyze dissimilarity data [11]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call