Abstract
The study of cholinergic signaling in the mammalian CNS has been greatly facilitated by the advent of mouse lines that permit the expression of reporter proteins, such as opsins, in cholinergic neurons. However, the expression of opsins could potentially perturb the physiology of opsin-expressing cholinergic neurons or mouse behavior. Indeed, the published literature includes examples of cellular and behavioral perturbations in preparations designed to drive expression of opsins in cholinergic neurons. Here we investigate expression of opsins, cellular physiology of cholinergic neurons and behavior in two mouse lines, in which channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and archaerhodopsin (Arch) are expressed in cholinergic neurons using the Cre-lox system. The two mouse lines were generated by crossing ChAT-Cre mice with Cre-dependent reporter lines Ai32(ChR2-YFP) and Ai35(Arch-GFP). In most mice from these crosses, we observed expression of ChR2 and Arch in only cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain and in other putative cholinergic neurons in the forebrain. In small numbers of mice, off-target expression occurred, in which fluorescence did not appear limited to cholinergic neurons. Whole-cell recordings from fluorescently-labeled basal forebrain neurons revealed that both proteins were functional, driving depolarization (ChR2) or hyperpolarization (Arch) upon illumination, with little effect on passive membrane properties, spiking pattern or spike waveform. Finally, performance on a behavioral discrimination task was comparable to that of wild-type mice. Our results indicate that ChAT-Cre x reporter line crosses provide a simple, effective resource for driving indicator and opsin expression in cholinergic neurons with few adverse consequences and are therefore an valuable resource for studying the cholinergic system.
Highlights
Mouse lines are in increasingly common use in studies of cholinergic signaling in the mammalian CNS, often via the expression of reporter proteins, such as opsins, in cholinergic neurons
Greater than 90% of cholinergic neurons in basal forebrain were co-labeled with reporter (Fig 1B; ChR2-YFP in 93 ± 1.5% of choline acetyltransferanse (ChAT)+ somata, 214 somata in 7 ChAT-Cre/Ai32(ChR2-YFP) mice; Arch-GFP in 94 ± 1.1% of ChAT+ somata, 188 somata in 4 ChAT-Cre/Ai35 (Arch-GFP) mice)
Our results indicate that crossing ChAT-Cre and Ai32 or Ai35 mouse lines results in expression of functional ChR2 and Arch, respectively, in cholinergic neurons
Summary
Mouse lines are in increasingly common use in studies of cholinergic signaling in the mammalian CNS, often via the expression of reporter proteins, such as opsins, in cholinergic neuronsPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0156596 May 31, 2016Transgenic Mice with Opsins in Cholinergic Neurons [1]. Three distinct variants of this strategy have been employed: injection of Cre-dependent virus into ChAT-Cre mice, breeding ChAT-Cre and Cre-dependent reporter mouse lines, and the generation of transgenic mice expressing the reporter protein directly from the ChAT promoter. Each of these strategies has advantages and disadvantages. By restricting expression to neurons close to the injection site, viral expression offers the ability to drive expression in only a sub-set of cholinergic neurons This advantage comes at the cost of possible variability between mice in the location of expression. Viruses can drive strong expression in infected neurons, expression may be limited to a random subset of neurons within the injection site (e.g. [2]) and this incomplete penetrance may, for example, prevent silencing of all cholinergic neurons within a target region
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.