Abstract

Improved resolution of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) allows for the characterization of mitochondrial (mt) DNA heteroplasmy to levels previously unattainable with traditional sequencing approaches. An essential criterion for the reporting of heteroplasmy is the ability of the MPS method to distinguish minor sequence variants (MSVs) from system noise, or error. Therefore, an assessment of the background noise in the MPS method is desirable to identify the point at which reliable data can be reported. Substitution and sequence specific error (SSE) was evaluated for a variety of sample types and two library preparations. Substitution error rates ranged from 0.18 to 0.49 per 100 nucleotides with C positions generally having the highest rate of misincorporation. Comparison of error rates across sample types indicated a significant increase for samples with damaged DNA. The positions of error were varied across datasets (pairwise concordance 0–68%), but had greater consistency within the damaged samples (80–96%). The most commonly observed motif preceding error in forward reads was CCG, while GGT was most common in reverse reads, both consistent with previous findings. The findings illustrate that for datasets containing samples with damaged DNA, reporting thresholds for heteroplasmy may have to be modified and individual sites with error levels exceeding thresholds should be scrutinized. Collectively, the shifting error profiles observed across the various sample types and library preparation methods demonstrates the need for an assessment of error under these varying circumstances. Characterization of the applicable background noise will help to ensure that thresholds are reliably set for detection of true MSVs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.