Abstract

The replication of wild-type herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) was very sensitive to aphidicolin, a specific inhibitor of eukaryotic α-type DNA polymerases; viral DNA synthesis was strongly inhibited by 1 μg/ml of aphidicolin, but the synthesis of early viral polypeptides was not affected. Using aphidicolin as the selective agent, aphidicolin-resistant (Aph r) viruses were isolated from HSV-2 strain 186. All of these plaque isolates induced altered viral DNA polymerases which were more resistant to aphidicolin than wild-type polymerase. These results clearly indicate that viral DNA polymerase is a target of aphidicolin in vivo and suggest that host cell DNA polymerase α may be not involved in the replication of HSV-2. Partially purified mutant polymerase exhibited a 7.5-fold lower apparent K m for dCTP and a 3-fold lower apparent K m for dTTP than similarly purified wild-type enzyme. The apparent K i value for aphidicolin of the mutant polymerase was 6.5-fold higher than that of the wild-type enzyme. Moreover, all Aph r viruses isolated were also resistant to thymine-l-β- d-arabinofuranoside (ara-T). While, they were as sensitive as wild-type virus to cytosine-1-β- d-arabinofuranoside (ara-C), adenine-9-β- d-arabinofuranoside (ara-A), and acycloguanosine (acyclo-G). Interestingly these Aph r isolates were more sensitive to phosphonoacetic acid (PAA) than the wild-type. In contrast, PAA-resistant (PAA r) viruses of HSV-2 were more sensitive to aphidicolin and were more resistant to all of four nucleoside analogs than the parental wild-type virus. These results suggest that the aphidicolin-binding site of HSV DNA polymerase may be very close to the binding sites for dCTP and dTTP and it functionally correlates with that for pyrophosphate group.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call