Characterization of a nonhepatic alcohol dehydrogenase from rat hepatocellular carcinoma and stomach

Abstract

Ethanol oxidation by the soluble fraction of a rat hepatoma was compared to that of the liver. Ethanol oxidation by the hepatoma was NAD +-dependent and sensitive to pyrazole, suggesting the presence of alcohol dehydrogenase. At low concentrations of ethanol (10.8 m m) the alcohol dehydrogenase activities of hepatoma and liver supernatant fractions were comparable. When the concentration of ethanol was raised to 108 m m, the activity of the liver enzyme decreased, whereas the activity in hepatoma supernatant fractions was strikingly elevated. m-Nitrobenzaldehyde-reducing activity was also conspicuously higher in hepatoma supernatant fractions. By contrast the ability to metabolize steroids and cyclohexanone was less than that in supernatant fractions of the liver. Electrophoresis of the liver supernatant fractions on ionagar at pH 7.0 revealed only one component that oxidized ethanol. On the other hand, hepatoma supernatant fractions contained two components with alcohol dehydrogenase activity; one with the same electrophoretic mobility as the liver enzyme, the other showing a slower rate of migration. The latter component, which is absent in the liver, is referred to as hepatoma alcohol dehydrogenase. By electrophoresis on starch gels at pH 8.5, it could be demonstrated that the liver and hepatoma enzymes moved in opposite directions. The liver and hepatoma enzymes differ in electrophoretic mobility, susceptibility to heat treatment, pH activity optimum and some catalytic properties. The substrate specificity of the hepatoma enzyme is narrower than that of liver alcohol dehydrogenase; cyclohexanone or 3β-hydroxysteroids of A/B cis configuration and the corresponding 3-ketones are not substrates for the hepatoma enzyme. The overall substrate specificity characteristics are, however, similar to those of the liver enzyme in that the effectiveness of substrates increases with an increase in chain length and introduction of unsaturation or an aromatic group. Both liver and hepatoma alcohol dehydrogenase cross-react with antibody to horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase EE. The Michaelis constant for ethanol with the hepatoma enzyme is 223 m m, compared to 0.3 m m for liver alcohol dehydrogenase; at 1.0 m ethanol the hepatoma enzyme is not fully saturated with substrate. The Michaelis constant for 2-hexene-1-ol is 0.3 m m, indicating that the hepatoma enzyme is better suited for dehydrogenation of longer chain alcohols. Stomach alcohol dehydrogenase has kinetic properties comparable to those of the hepatoma enzyme, as well as similar electrophoretic mobility. The hepatoma enzyme can be detected in the serum of rats bearing hepatomas.