Abstract

Fluvial sedimentary successions represent porous media that host groundwater and geothermal resources. Additionally, they overlie crystalline rocks hosting nuclear waste repositories in rift settings. The permeability characteristics of an arenaceous fluvial succession, the Triassic St Bees Sandstone Formation in England (UK), are described, from core-plug to well-test scale up to ~1 km depth. Within such lithified successions, dissolution associated with the circulation of meteoric water results in increased permeability (K~10−1–100 m/day) to depths of at least 150 m below ground level (BGL) in aquifer systems that are subject to rapid groundwater circulation. Thus, contaminant transport is likely to occur at relatively high rates. In a deeper investigation (> 150 m depth), where the aquifer has not been subjected to rapid groundwater circulation, well-test-scale hydraulic conductivity is lower, decreasing from K~10−2 m/day at 150–400 m BGL to 10−3 m/day down-dip at ~1 km BGL, where the pore fluid is hypersaline. Here, pore-scale permeability becomes progressively dominant with increasing lithostatic load. Notably, this work investigates a sandstone aquifer of fluvial origin at investigation depths consistent with highly enthalpy geothermal reservoirs (~0.7–1.1 km). At such depths, intergranular flow dominates in unfaulted areas with only minor contribution by bedding plane fractures. However, extensional faults represent preferential flow pathways, due to presence of high connective open fractures. Therefore, such faults may (1) drive nuclear waste contaminants towards the highly permeable shallow (< 150 m BGL) zone of the aquifer, and (2) influence fluid recovery in geothermal fields.

Highlights

  • Fluvial deposits form thick sedimentary successions (> 0.5 km) in basins for which accommodation was generated in response to extensional, compressional and strike slip tectonics, as well as thermal subsidence (Bosellini 1989; Carvalho and Vesely 2017; Ielpi and Ghinassi 2015; Waugh 1973)

  • Fluvial deposits represent porous media, which can serve as important hosts for hydrocarbon and geothermal resources (McKie and Williams 2009; Ruggeri and Gianelli 1999); they serve as important groundwater aquifers (Tellam and Barker 2006; Tellam 2004)

  • scanning electron microscope (SEM) and optical microscope images (Figs. 5a–f, 6a–f and 7a– c) realized on three different sandstone units show how the sheet-like (Ush) and the white-channel (Uws) sandstones are characterized by a fine-grained sand, whereas the red-channel sandstone (Urs) is medium-grained sandstone

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluvial deposits form thick sedimentary successions (> 0.5 km) in basins for which accommodation was generated in response to extensional, compressional and strike slip tectonics, as well as thermal subsidence (Bosellini 1989; Carvalho and Vesely 2017; Ielpi and Ghinassi 2015; Waugh 1973). Thick accumulations of fluvial sediments of Triassic age are especially widespread, being represented in South and North America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia; many such examples form the fill of rift valleys that developed due to the break-up of Pangaea (Walker 1967; Waugh 1973; Ziegler 1982). Cyclical fragmentation of cratons over geological time scales places these sediments, which form rift-basin fills, upon relatively low permeability meta-igneous basement rocks. In some basins, these basement rocks are used to host nuclear waste repositories (Berglund et al 2009; Michie 1996; Waugh 1973). Fluvial deposits represent porous media, which can serve as important hosts for hydrocarbon and geothermal resources (McKie and Williams 2009; Ruggeri and Gianelli 1999); they serve as important groundwater aquifers (Tellam and Barker 2006; Tellam 2004)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call