Characterization and prognostic factors of secondary to MDS/MPN and therapy-related AML: a single-center study

Abstract

Introduction: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) accounts for 15–30% of overall AML cases and is associated with shorter survival compared to de novo AML. The pathogenetic spectrum of sAML is heterogeneous, i.e. therapy-related AML (tAML) arises from prior cytotoxic, radiation, or immunosuppressive therapy, while myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN)-AML develops from a previous clonal disorder of hematopoiesis. Material and methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of MDS/MPN-AML and tAML patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 in the Hematology Department of the Medical University in Lodz, Poland. Simultaneously, demographic data, clinical factors, and laboratory findings were collected. For statistical analysis, we used Cox proportional hazard models and log-rank tests. Results: The study included 110 patients with either MDS/MPN-AML (n = 78) or tAML (n = 32), with a median age of 66 years (range 31–86). The median follow-up was 3.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5–5.3]. The median overall survival (OS) for MDS/MPN-AML patients was 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.5–7.0) and for tAML it was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.6-5.6). In multivariate Cox regression model for OS, factors such as age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.06], higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score (HR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.08–3.15), hypoalbuminemia (HR 3.20, 95% CI: 1.95–5.24) and percentage of bone marrow blasts infiltration (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03) were independent predictors of poor survival for the whole cohort. On the other hand, the intensive treatment approach was related to longer survival (HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21–0.82). There were no differences in OS between MDS/MPN-AML and tAML ( p = 0.81). Conclusion: The poor treatment outcomes for sAML consist of a combination of low response rate and high early mortality. The positive influence of intensive chemotherapy should be highlighted, but nevertheless, optimizing treatment for thishigh-risk subpopulation remains crucial.