CHARACTERIZATION AND PHYLOGENETIC POSITION OF THE ENIGMATIC GOLDEN ALGA PHAEOTHAMNION CONFERVICOLA: ULTRASTRUCTURE, PIGMENT COMPOSITION AND PARTIAL SSU rDNA SEQUENCE

Abstract

The morphology, ultrastructure, photosynthetic pigments, and nuclear‐encoded small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) were examined for Phaeothamnion confervicola Lagerheim strain SAG119.79. The morphology of the vegetative filaments, as viewed under light microscopy, was indistinguishable from the isotype. Light microscopy, including epifluorescence microscopy, also revealed the presence of one to three chloroplasts in both vegetative cells and zoospores. Vegetative filaments occasionally transformed to a palmelloid stage in old cultures. An eyespot was not visible in zoospores when examined with light microscopy, but small droplets, similar to eyespot droplets, were apparent beneath the shorter flagellum when cells were viewed with electron microscopy. Zoospores had two flagella that were laterally inserted in the cell approximately one‐third of the cell length from the apex. The longer flagellum was directed anteriorly and the shorter flagellum was directed posteriorly. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of tubular tripartite flagellar hairs on the longer flagellum, but no lateral filaments were found on the tripartite hairs. The general organization of the flagellar root system was similar to that of zoospores belonging to the Xanthophyceae and Phaeophyceae. However, the transitional region of the flagella contained a transitional helix with four to six gyres. Microtubular root R1 consisted of six microtubules at its proximal end and one microtubule at its distal end. Roots R2 and R4 consisted of one microtubule each and root R3 consisted of two microtubules. No rhizoplast was found. Thin‐layer chromatography revealed the presence of fucoxanthin, diadinoxanthin, neoxanthin, and heteroxanthin as well as chlorophylls a, c1 and c2. High‐performance liquid chromatography revealed the presence of fucoxanthin, diadinoxanthin, diatoxanthin, heteroxanthin, and β,β‐carotene as well as chlorophylls a and c. The complete sequence of the SSU rDNA could not be obtained, but a partial sequence (1201 bases) was determined. Parsimony and neighbor‐joining distance analyses of SSU rDNA from Phaeothamnion and 36 other chromophyte algae (with two Öomycete fungi as the outgroup) indicated that Phaeothamnion was a weakly supported (bootstrap = <50%, 52%) sister taxon to the Xanthophyceae representatives and that this combined clade was in turn a weakly supported (bootstrap = <50%, 67%) sister to the Phaeophyceae. Based upon ultrastructural observations, pigment analysis, and SSU rDNA phylogenetic analysis, Phaeothamnion is not a member of the Chrysophyceae and should be classified as incertae sedis with affinities to the Xanthophyceae and Phaeophyceae.