Abstract

Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) induces disease in susceptible hosts, notably impacting cultivation of important crop species of the Brassica genus. Few effective plant viral disease management strategies exist with the majority of current approaches aiming to mitigate the virus indirectly through control of aphid vector species. Multiple sources of genetic resistance to TuMV have been identified previously, although the majority are strain-specific and have not been exploited commercially. Here, two Brassica juncea lines (TWBJ14 and TWBJ20) with resistance against important TuMV isolates (UK 1, vVIR24, CDN 1, and GBR 6) representing the most prevalent pathotypes of TuMV (1, 3, 4, and 4, respectively) and known to overcome other sources of resistance, have been identified and characterized. Genetic inheritance of both resistances was determined to be based on a recessive two-gene model. Using both single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) methods, quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses were performed using first backcross (BC1) genetic mapping populations segregating for TuMV resistance. Pairs of statistically significant TuMV resistance-associated QTLs with additive interactive effects were identified on chromosomes A03 and A06 for both TWBJ14 and TWBJ20 material. Complementation testing between these B. juncea lines indicated that one resistance-linked locus was shared. Following established resistance gene nomenclature for recessive TuMV resistance genes, these new resistance-associated loci have been termed retr04 (chromosome A06, TWBJ14, and TWBJ20), retr05 (A03, TWBJ14), and retr06 (A03, TWBJ20). Genotyping by sequencing data investigated in parallel to robust SNP array data was highly suboptimal, with informative data not established for key BC1 parental samples. This necessitated careful consideration and the development of new methods for processing compromised data. Using reductive screening of potential markers according to allelic variation and the recombination observed across BC1 samples genotyped, compromised GBS data was rendered functional with near-equivalent QTL outputs to the SNP array data. The reductive screening strategy employed here offers an alternative to methods relying upon imputation or artificial correction of genotypic data and may prove effective for similar biparental QTL mapping studies.

Highlights

  • Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) belongs to the Potyvirus genus and causes significant economic losses through diminished harvest yield and produce quality of infected crops, cultivated species of the Brassica genus (Walsh and Jenner, 2002)

  • Two S2 populations produced by selfing both TuMVresistant TWBJ14 S1 and TWBJ20 S1 plants exhibited uniform resistance when challenged with TuMV isolates UK 1, vVIR24 and CDN 1 (Table 2)

  • Subsequent phenotyping of both TWBJ14 and TWBJ20 F2 and BC1 populations further reinforced this; the observed patterns of segregation between TuMV resistance and susceptibility did not differ significantly according to chi-square (χ2) analyses from expected ratios based on a model of two recessive genes (TWBJ14 F2 χ2 = 0.094, TWBJ14 BC1 χ2 = 0.150, TWBJ20 BC1 χ2 = 2.38 < χ20.05 = 3.84; Table 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) belongs to the Potyvirus genus and causes significant economic losses through diminished harvest yield and produce quality of infected crops, cultivated species of the Brassica genus (Walsh and Jenner, 2002) It can infect at least 318 plant species (Edwardson and Christie, 1991) and be rapidly spread by over 89 aphid vector species through the non-persistent transmission route (Walsh and Jenner, 2002). Historic management of TuMV has predominantly relied on insecticides for the non-specific control of aphid vector species, chemical control is considered increasingly unviable This is partially due to resistances evolving across aphid populations against the mode-of-action(s) of key pesticides (Bass et al, 2014). Environmental concerns exist as pesticide misuse/ dependency continues to be a source of controversy with detrimental links suggested to non-target insect biodiversity (Lundin et al, 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call