Abstract

The repetitive content of the plant genome (repeatome) often represents its largest fraction and is frequently correlated with its size. Transposable elements (TEs), the main component of the repeatome, are an important driver in the genome diversification due to their fast-evolving nature. Hybridization and polyploidization events are hypothesized to induce massive bursts of TEs resulting, among other effects, in an increase of copy number and genome size. Little is known about the repeatome dynamics following hybridization and polyploidization in plants that reproduce by apomixis (asexual reproduction via seeds). To address this, we analyzed the repeatomes of two diploid parental species, Hieracium intybaceum and H. prenanthoides (sexual), their diploid F1 synthetic and their natural triploid hybrids (H. pallidiflorum and H. picroides, apomictic). Using low-coverage next-generation sequencing (NGS) and a graph-based clustering approach, we detected high overall similarity across all major repeatome categories between the parental species, despite their large phylogenetic distance. Medium and highly abundant repetitive elements comprise ∼70% of Hieracium genomes; most prevalent were Ty3/Gypsy chromovirus Tekay and Ty1/Copia Maximus-SIRE elements. No TE bursts were detected, neither in synthetic nor in natural hybrids, as TE abundance generally followed theoretical expectations based on parental genome dosage. Slight over- and under-representation of TE cluster abundances reflected individual differences in genome size. However, in comparative analyses, apomicts displayed an overabundance of pararetrovirus clusters not observed in synthetic hybrids. Substantial deviations were detected in rDNAs and satellite repeats, but these patterns were sample specific. rDNA and satellite repeats (three of them were newly developed as cytogenetic markers) were localized on chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In a few cases, low-abundant repeats (5S rDNA and certain satellites) showed some discrepancy between NGS data and FISH results, which is due partly to the bias of low-coverage sequencing and partly to low amounts of the satellite repeats or their sequence divergence. Overall, satellite DNA (including rDNA) was markedly affected by hybridization, but independent of the ploidy or reproductive mode of the progeny, whereas bursts of TEs did not play an important role in the evolutionary history of Hieracium.

Highlights

  • Repetitive elements, collectively known as the ‘repeatome’ (Maumus and Quesneville, 2014), comprise DNA fragments that are present in multiple copies throughout the genome

  • As we discovered a significant deviation in the amount of rDNA and satellite repeats in apomicts and synthetic hybrids, we localized these loci on the chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

  • Our results contribute to the understanding of plant genome evolution following hybridization and polyploidization and add to the knowledge about the genomic landscapes of polyploids known to undergo an asexual mode of reproduction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Repetitive elements, collectively known as the ‘repeatome’ (Maumus and Quesneville, 2014), comprise DNA fragments that are present in multiple copies throughout the genome Due to their fast-evolving nature and tendency toward accumulation, they represent one of the most important factors contributing to the remarkable variation of genome size in plants (Bennetzen et al, 2005). Tandem repeats are composed of multiple copies of the same DNA sequence (monomers) arrayed in a head-to-tail fashion They are usually classified based on the length of the monomer into microsatellite (up to 10 bp), minisatellite (10– 60 bp), and satellite repeats (from tens of base pairs up to several kilobases (Stupar et al, 2002; Ávila Robledillo et al, 2018). Their amount, chromosomal distribution, and homology may be genus-, species-, genome- or chromosome-specific, which make them useful markers for inheritance studies of interspecific hybrids (Hemleben et al, 2007)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.