Abstract

Extensile fluidic artificial muscles (EFAMs) are soft actuators known for their large ranges of extension, low weight, and blocked forces comparable to those of pneumatic cylinders. EFAMs have yet to be studied in a way that thoroughly focuses on their manufacturing, experimental characterization, and modeling. A fabrication method was developed for production of two EFAMs. The quasi-static axial force response of EFAMs to varying displacement was measured by testing two specimens under isobaric conditions over a pressure range of 103.4–517.1 kPa (15–75 psi) with 103.4 kPa (15 psi) increments. The muscles were characterized by a blocked force of 280 N and a maximum stroke of 98% at 517.1 kPa (75 psi). A force-balance model was used to analyze EFAM response. Prior work employing the force-balance approach used hyper-elastic constitutive models based on polynomial expressions. In this study, these models are validated for EFAMs, and new constitutive models are proposed that better represent the measured stress values of rubber as a function of strain. These constitutive models are compared in terms of accuracy when estimating pressure-dependent stress–strain relationships of the bladder material. The analysis demonstrates that the new hyper-elastic stress models have an error 5% smaller than models previously employed for EFAMs for the same number of coefficients. Finally, the analysis suggests that the new stress functions have smaller errors than the polynomial stress model with the same number of coefficients, guarantee material stability, and are more conservative about the stress values for strains outside of the testing range.

Highlights

  • Fluidic artificial muscles are soft actuators shown to have high specific power and long fatigue lifetimes [1,2,3]

  • Little was found in the literature on differences between contractile and extensile fluidic artificial muscles (FAMs) in manufacturing, testing and modeling as few studies dedicated to EFAMs were found

  • The first question in this study sought to determine whether the methods developed for Contractile FAMs (CFAMs) can be adapted for use with EFAMs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluidic artificial muscles ( known as pneumatic artificial muscles when they are operated with air) are soft actuators shown to have high specific power and long fatigue lifetimes [1,2,3]. With much greater elasticity and tolerance to large deformations than linear or rotational electric actuators, fluidic artificial muscles (FAMs) can be categorized as a subgroup of soft actuators. Due to advances in electric motor miniaturization, FAMs ( called McKibben muscles) started to lose their popularity in robotics and prosthetics research. It was not until the late 1980s, when a Japanese tire manufacturer, Bridgestone, patented its more powerful McKibben muscles and introduced the soft robotic manipulators “soft-arms” for painting applications [5,6,7] that the FAMs regained popularity and a broad research interest was revived. Due to their subtle physics and outstanding performance, FAMs remain an area of active research

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call