Abstract

ObjectiveResearch on serious infections/sepsis has focused on the hospital environment, while potentially the most delay, and therefore possibly the best opportunity to improve quality of care, lies in the prehospital setting. In this study we investigated the prehospital phase of adult emergency department (ED) patients with an infection.MethodsIn this prospective pilot study all adult (≥18y) patients with a suspected/proven infection, based on the notes in the patient’s ED chart, were included during a 4-week period in 2017. Prehospital course, ED findings, presence of sepsis and 30-day outcomes were registered.ResultsA total of 440 patients were identified, with a median symptom duration before ED visit of 3 days (IQR 1–7 days). Before arrival in the ED, 23.9% of patients had used antibiotics. Most patients (83.0%) had been referred by a general practitioner (GP), while 41.1% of patients had visited their GP previously during the current disease episode. Patients referred by a GP were triaged as high-urgency less often, while vital parameters were similar. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transported 268 (60.9%) of patients. Twenty-two patients (5.0%) experienced an adverse outcome (30-day all-cause mortality and/or admission to intensive care).ConclusionsPatients with a suspected infection had symptoms for 3 (IQR 1–7) days at the moment of presentation to the ED. During this prehospital phase patients often had consulted, and were treated by, their GP. Many were transported to the ED by EMS. Future research on severe infections should focus on the prehospital phase, targeting patients and primary care professionals.

Highlights

  • One of the challenges for physicians is to timely recognize patients with an infection who are at risk of developing sepsis

  • Patients referred by a general practitioner (GP) were triaged as high-urgency less often, while vital parameters were similar

  • The prehospital phase of emergency department (ED) patients with an infection severe infections should focus on the prehospital phase, targeting patients and primary care professionals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the challenges for physicians is to timely recognize patients with an infection who are at risk of developing sepsis. Research has focused on sepsis within the hospital and not on the prehospital professionals: emergency medical services (EMS) and general practitioners (GPs).[3,4] To our knowledge, the prehospital phase of ED patients with a suspected infection has not yet been investigated before. This phase could potentially include most delay and may possibly be the best phase to focus on when improving quality of care for sepsis patients

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.