Abstract
Features of the Meiyu frontal rain zone (MFZ, in 110–125°E) and Baiu frontal rain zone (BFZ, in 125–140°E) in the 20th Century simulation (20C3M) and 21st Century projection (Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A1B), obtained by 22 climate models contributed to the World Climate Research Programme's Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) are studied. Characteristics of the MFZ and BFZ in the 20th century climate simulation are compared with two sets of observed precipitation data. The latitude of the zone and the precipitation in the zone (“precipitation in FZ”) reproduced by the models are examined, using the 20-year (1980–1999) averaged values for May, June and July. The “precipitation in FZ” in each month obtained from the multi-model ensemble average (MEA) coincides approximately with the observation data. However, MEA reproduces MFZ and BFZ to the north of their observed latitude in May. MEA reasonably reproduces the latitude BFZ for June and July, and the latitude of MFZ only for June. The standard deviation (STD) of the “precipitation in FZ” does not change widely from zone to zone, and from month to month. However, STD of the latitude of zones varies widely. The STD of latitude of MFZ and BFZ became larger in July. The STD of the latitude of MFZ is larger than that of BFZ. The low and medium horizontal resolution models with moist convective adjustment scheme tend to reproduce MFZ and BFZ in the northern latitude, while the models with mass flux scheme and models with Arakawa-Schubert scheme tend to reproduce MFZ and BFZ in the southern latitude. Features of the MFZ and BFZ in the 21st century climate projection by the models are examined using the 20-year (2080–2099) averaged values for May, June and July. The characteristics of the models in regard to MFZ and BFZ in 20th century simulation are commonly found in the 21st century projection. The MFZ and BFZ shift slightly northward, and the “precipitation in FZ” decreased slightly from the 20th century to 21st century. However, these changes are very small, as compared with the respective STD. The change of MFZ and BFZ under the climate changes in the 21st century can not be definitely concluded by models of CMIP3.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.