Abstract

e21530 Background: The features and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma are not well established in our country. Our objective is to collect and analyze the characteristics of a cohort of Colombian patients. Methods: Analytical cohort study based on the Epidemiologic Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia (REMMEC). Data were collected between January 2011 and December 2023. Patients older than 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced melanoma were included. Descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics and survival analysis using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier models were performed. Results: 322 patients were included. Median age was 66.5 years (range 55-76), 56% (180) of patients were men, 87% (280) had advanced disease at diagnosis, most (82%) with non-brain metastases and 51% (164) with multiple organ involvement. Table 1. For first-line treatment, patients received single-agent immunotherapy (37.26%), doublet immunotherapy (10.25%), targeted therapy (9%), and chemotherapy (7.14%), while 29% received best supportive care BSC. In the second line, single agent immunotherapy 9.32%, targeted therapy (4.34%), doublet immunotherapy 3.42%, chemotherapy (5%) and 77% received BSC. In the third line, only 9% (29) of patients were able to receive any therapy. Median follow-up was 16 months (IQR 7-32), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (IQR 4-35) and median overall survival (OS) was 23 months (IQR 9-66). OS in the first-line setting with immunotherapy as monotherapy was 23 months (IQR 12-40) HR 0.40 P 0.035 and with doublet immunotherapy 16 months (IQR 8-28) HR 0.16 P 0.005 Clinical characteristics associated with lower median OS were brain metastasis (HR 1,95 P 0.001), ECOG 3-4 (HR 5,49 P 0.001) and multiple metastatic disease (HR 2,15 P 0.001). According to acral vs. non-acral histologic type, the median OS was 26 vs. 44 months, respectively (HR 1.30 P 0.26). Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma, we found clinical outcomes similar to those reported in the worldwide literature. It is necessary to continue the registry and follow-up of patients to identify specific prognostic factors. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call